• Users Online: 476
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 49

Risk factors associated with self-reported sexually transmitted infections among postsecondary students in Canada


School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada

Date of Submission11-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance03-Apr-2018
Date of Web Publication04-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
John Moraros
School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, E-Wing Health Sciences, Room 3320, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 2Z4
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_444_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Despite major public health efforts in addressing the burden of disease caused by sexually transmitted infections (STIs), rates among young adults continue to rise in Canada. The purpose of the study was to examine the prevalence and risk factors associated with acquiring STIs among postsecondary students in Canada. Methods: A secondary analysis of the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II-C Spring 2016 survey data (n = 43,780) was conducted. Sexually active participants (n = 28,831) were examined for their demographics, sexual behavior, alcohol and marijuana use, testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and human papillomavirus vaccination history. These factors were analyzed to help identify their possible association with acquiring an STI using logistic regression and multivariate modeling. Results: Among the study participants, 3.88% had an STI, with the highest rates observed among females and individuals aged 21–24 years old. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that participants who engaged in anal intercourse within the past 30 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.634; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.343–1.988), had four or more sexual partners in the last 12 months (OR = 4.223; 95% CI, 3.595–4.962), used marijuana within the past 30 days (OR = 1.641; 95% CI, 1.387–1.941), and had ever been tested for HIV (OR = 3.008; 95% CI, 2.607–3.471) had greater odds of acquiring an STI. Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight certain high-risk behaviors that are strongly associated with acquiring an STI among postsecondary students. Thus, efforts to design and deliver relevant educational programming and health promotion initiatives for this particular population are of utmost importance.

Keywords: Behaviors, Canada, risks, sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus, students


How to cite this article:
Haghir E, Madampage C, Mahmood R, Moraros J. Risk factors associated with self-reported sexually transmitted infections among postsecondary students in Canada. Int J Prev Med 2018;9:49

How to cite this URL:
Haghir E, Madampage C, Mahmood R, Moraros J. Risk factors associated with self-reported sexually transmitted infections among postsecondary students in Canada. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 15];9:49. Available from: http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2018/9/1/49/233790


  Introduction Top


Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a significant public health concern in Canada and the world.[1] According to the World Health Organization, over 360 million people acquire an STI annually.[2] Among the most common, STIs are chlamydia, gonorrhea, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human papillomavirus (HPV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV)[2],[3],[4] resulting in a loss of over 65 million disability-adjusted life years in 2015.[5] In Canada, STIs and their health consequences are equally as important, with billions of dollars in estimated cost and significant implications for reproductive, maternal, and newborn health.[1],[6]

It is estimated that approximately 80% of young Canadians between the ages of 20 and 24 years old are sexually active.[7] Unsurprisingly, this age group also reports the highest rates of STIs.[3],[7] Postsecondary students, generally fall within this age group and given their sexual activity are at an increased risk to acquire an STI.[8],[9] Most postsecondary students are living away from home for the first time, with minimal supervision and therefore, may engage in risky sexual behaviors such as unprotected sex, having multiple sexual partners, and having sex while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, which can put them at a higher risk for acquiring STIs.[8],[9],[10],[11] A national sample of Canadian postsecondary students reported that less than half of them used a condom during their last vaginal intercourse.[12] Another study among eight Canadian universities found that 62% of students who had vaginal intercourse were never tested for STIs and 85% were never tested for HIV.[3]

Sociodemographic characteristics have also been reported to be associated with STIs. Risk factors include age, sex, race/ethnicity, and relationship status.[13] In 2012, Canadians aged 20–24 years old reported the highest rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV, HPV, and HSV infections with females having higher rates than males.[14],[15],[16],[17] According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, the STI prevalence among Aboriginal peoples is estimated to be higher than the overall population rates particularly with respect to HIV.[8],[18] Multiple studies also showed a strong correlation between marital and relationship status and the risk of acquiring an STI.[19],[20]

Despite major public health efforts, including sexual health education, population screening, and early medical interventions,[2] the rates of STIs among young adults continue to rise in Canada.[8] This implies the need for further research into the epidemiology of STIs, and particularly among postsecondary students. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with STIs by analyzing secondary data from 41 Canadian postsecondary institutions.


  Methods Top


Study design

This study used the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II-C (ACHA-NCHA II-C), Spring 2016 survey data. This is a national survey prepared and coordinated by the ACHA.[21] Forty-one, self-selected Canadian postsecondary institutions participated in the survey. Institutions that either collected data by random sampling or surveyed all their students formed the Canadian reference group.[22],[23],[24]

Instrument

The primary data were collected through a self-reported online survey, which consists of over 300 questions in nine sections.[21],[25] The generalizability, reliability, and validity analysis of this survey instrument have been statistically assessed and explained in detail elsewhere.[25],[26]

Participants

A total of 43,780 students across Canada completed the survey with an overall response rate of 19.2%.[21] For the purposes of this study, we only included respondents who met the following criteria: They were at least 18-year-old, attended one of the participating Canadian College institutions, and self-identified as being sexually active during the last 12 months. Using these criteria, 28,831 (65.85%) students were eligible to be included in our study.

Variables explored

Variable selection process

This study examined a number of variables associated with both “high risk behaviors” as well as “high-risk groups” for STIs among postsecondary students in Canada. High-risk behaviors were characterized on the basis of the number of sex partners, types of sexual behaviors (vaginal, anal, and oral sex), alcohol use, and marijuana use. High-risk groups were characterized on the basis of younger age participants, who were single, female, and minority (Aboriginals). Previous testing for HIV and HPV vaccination were also used as variables because recent reports in Canada suggest that sexually active individuals are not being tested for STIs, and specifically HIV [3] and it is feared that HPV vaccination may lead to increased risky sexual behavior among youth.[27]

Outcome variable

A dichotomous (yes, no) variable indicating whether or not the respondent had a history of STI over the past 12 months was created. Participants who reported receiving a diagnosis or treatment for any of the following infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV, HPV, and HSV) within the last 12 months were classified as having a history of STI.

Independent variables

Variables of interest in this study included in this study:

  1. Demographics: Age group (18–20; 21–24; 25–29; 30 or more), Aboriginal status (yes, no), Biological sex (female, male), and relationship status was recoded as a separate dichotomous variable (yes, no)
  2. Sexual behavior: The number of sexual partners in the last 12 months (one, two, three, four or more) and if the person had vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse and oral sex (never; yes, but not in the past 30 days; and yes, in the past 30 days)
  3. Alcohol and marijuana use: Alcohol and marijuana use (never; yes, but not in the past 30 days; yes, in the past 30 days)
  4. Testing and vaccination history: Ever been tested for HIV and HPV vaccination status (yes, no, don't know).


Statistical analysis and model building

Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations were used to summarize general characteristics of the data. Univariate analyses to determine whether there was an association between the outcome (i.e., STI) and independent variables were carried out. Then, a series of bivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. We removed any variable with P ≥ 0.25 from our first multivariable model. The remaining variables were analyzed for multicollinearity (variance inflation factor ≥2.5).

For model selection, we adapted the method as described by Hosmer et al.[28],[29] A variable selection decision at every step of the modeling process was made using a P ≤ 0.05 as the significance level. When a variable was removed, confounding was assessed by comparing the values of the estimated regression coefficients between the two models at each stage. Any change in the regression coefficient values by 20% or more was considered an indication of confounding and the variable was kept in the model. All possible interactions among the variables in the model were checked, using 0.05 as the level of significance. Finally, Hosmer et al. Goodness of fit tests were used to determine the appropriateness of our model. Data were analyzed using both SAS software version 9.4 and SPSS Statistics software version 24 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).


  Results Top


Descriptive statistics

A total of 43,780 Canadian postsecondary students participated in the Canadian ACHA-NCHA II-C, Spring 2016 survey. Among these participants, 28,831 (65.85%) reported being sexually active and 3.88% reported being diagnosed and/or treated with an STI within the last 12 months. The descriptive characteristics of the study population (demographics [sex, age, Aboriginal status and relationship status], sexual behavioral characteristics [vaginal and anal intercourse, oral sex, and number of sex partners], alcohol and marijuana use, HIV testing, and HPV vaccination) are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Descriptive characteristics of the sexually active college students in Canada

Click here to view


Univariate analysis

Univariate analysis examining the association between STIs and demographics, sexual behaviors, alcohol and marijuana use, HIV testing, and HPV vaccination status are presented in [Table 2]. Biological sex, age, Aboriginal status, relationship status, vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, oral sex, number of sex partners, use of alcohol, use of marijuana, HIV tested, and HPV vaccinated were significantly associated with STI status. On the other hand, body mass index classification, current residence, and international student status were not statistically significant.
Table 2: Univariate analysis of sexually transmitted infections among sexually active college students in Canada

Click here to view


Logistic regression modeling

The results of logistic regression modeling are presented in [Table 3]. The main findings from our analysis include female students were more likely to acquire an STI compared to males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.296; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.106–1.519); individuals 21–24 years old were more likely to acquire an STI compared to individuals aged 18–20 (OR = 1.457; 95% CI, 1.247–1.701); those who engaged in anal intercourse within the past 30 days were more likely to have an STI compared to those who never engaged in anal intercourse (OR = 1.634; 95% CI, 1.343–1.988); students reporting four or more sex partners over the past 12 months were more likely to acquire an STI compared to those with one sex partner over the past 12 months (OR = 4.223; 95% CI, 3.595–4.962); students who used marijuana in the past 30 days were more likely to acquire an STI compared to students who never used it (OR = 1.641 95% CI, 1.387–1.941); and students who have ever been tested for HIV were more likely to acquire an STI compared to students who have not (OR = 3.008; 95% CI, 2.607–3.471).
Table 3: Multivariable analysis of sexually transmitted infections among sexually active college students in Canada

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The present study describes the association of STIs with certain risk factors among postsecondary students in Canada. Our findings suggest that a wide array of demographic, sexual behaviors, marijuana use, history of HIV testing, and HPV vaccination factors influence the risk of acquiring an STI.

From the demographic perspective, the results of our study show significant associations between being a female in the 21–24 age group and the likelihood of acquiring an STI (OR = 1.296; 95% CI, 1.106–1.519 and OR = 1.457; 95% CI,1.247–1.701, respectively). Our findings for females [13],[30] in this age group [3],[7],[8],[13] are consistent with those reported in previous studies. In 2010, The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada reported that 86% of full-time undergraduate students were under the age of 25-year-old.[31] This group is not only among the most sexually active subpopulation [9],[13] but are also more likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors,[32] which puts them at an increased risk to contract an STI. The reasons for higher rates of STIs among females as compared to males are multifactorial and in the literature have been attributed to a more delicate vaginal mucosa and the tendency for most STIs to be less symptomatic in women and therefore, go untreated.[33]

Regarding sexual behaviours, our study results demonstrate that participants who had ever engaged in anal intercourse, and those who did so within the past 30 days, are significantly more likely to acquire STIs compared to those who never engaged in anal intercourse (OR = 1.535; 95% CI, 1.330–1.772 and OR = 1.634; 95% CI, 1.343–1.988, respectively). These findings are similar to those reported in the previous studies.[34],[35]

Engaging in heterosexual anal intercourse is not an uncommon practice among sexually active young women,[35] with even greater rates reported in those with higher education and income level.[35],[36] Interestingly, we found that 37% of our study participants have engaged in anal intercourse, which is higher than the 23% reported in previous research among sexually active undergraduate students.[34] These results emphasize the importance of openly discussing anal intercourse during any sexual health consult with postsecondary students and raising awareness of its potential risks.

Our study results indicate that participants with four or more sexual partners, in the last 12 months, and those who used marijuana, particularly in the last 30 days, had a significantly greater likelihood of acquiring STIs (OR = 4.223; 95% CI, 3.595–4.962 and OR = 1.641; 95% CI, 1.387–1.941, respectively). These findings are noteworthy because several studies report an association between multiple sexual partners and higher use of marijuana [37],[38],[39],[40],[41] and lower use of condoms during sex.[42] Possible explanations for these risky behaviors may include peer influence and the tendency for having casual sex among postsecondary students.[43],[44] Our results may have significant implications, given the upcoming changes in Canadian legislation regarding the legalization of marijuana use and merit further research.

Limitations and strengths

This study has a number of limitations and several strengths. First, since participating postsecondary institutions in the survey were self-selected, the results may not be generalizable. However, all Canadian institutions that participated in the survey were included in the analysis.[21] This, along with the large sample size, help minimize the risk of bias. Second, as with all other self-reported data, our results are subject to recall and social desirability bias. As for the latter, while it is impossible to eliminate, numerous studies have shown the use of anonymous web-based survey tends to reduce it.[45],[46] Moreover, the relatively recent time-frame of most questions (last 30 days or last 12 months), would minimize the chance of recall bias.[47] Finally, our study is cross-sectional in design and therefore, unable to draw causal inferences between the variables explored and the occurrence of STIs. Our study also has a number of significant strengths. It uses recent data (2016) from the largest-ever Canadian cohort to complete the ACHA-NCHA II survey. The survey instrument is robust, generalizable, reliable, and valid. Our findings provide valuable insight into the risk factors associated with STIs among Canadian postsecondary students.


  Conclusions Top


This study underscores the significance of STIs as a serious and growing public health concern. Postsecondary students are particularly vulnerable to STIs, which makes understanding their sexual behaviors an important topic for consideration. Furthermore, a number of risky sexual behaviors among this population occur concurrently, which increases their likelihood of acquiring STIs. Our findings could prove useful to university health centers, health care practitioners, and health educators in search of ways to reduce postsecondary students' risk of STIs.

Acknowledgments

Our special thanks to Ms. Rita Hanoski and Ms. Jocelyn Orb, Student Health Services, University of Saskatchewan for their kind assistance and support during this research project.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Report on Sexually Transmitted Infections in Canada: 2012. Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) Fact Sheet. WHO; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 31].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cragg A. Understanding STI and HIV Testing Rates Among Higher Risk University Students [MSc]. Dalhousie University; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wasik M, Djuric Kachli M. A review of common sexually transmitted diseases. Formulary 2009;44:78-86.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
GBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1603-58.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Kingston-Riechers J. The Economic Cost of HIV/AIDS in Canada. Edmonton (Alberta): Canadian AIDS Society; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cassidy C, Curran J, Steenbeek A, Langille D. University students' sexual health knowledge: A Scoping literature review. Can J Nurs Res 2015;47:18-38.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Sexually Transmitted Infections-A Continued Public Health Concern – The Chief Public Health Officer's Report on the State of Public Health in Canada, 2013: Infectious Disease-The Never-Ending Threat – Public Health Agency of Canada. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cphorsphc-respcacsp/2013/sti-its-eng.php. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 25].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chanakira E, Goyder EC, Freeman JV, O'Cathain A, Kinghorn G, Jakubovic M, et al. Social and psychosocial factors associated with high-risk sexual behaviour among university students in the United Kingdom: A web-survey. Int J STD AIDS 2015;26:369-78.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Adefuye AS, Abiona TC, Balogun JA, Lukobo-Durrell M. HIV sexual risk behaviors and perception of risk among college students: Implications for planning interventions. BMC Public Health 2009;9:281.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Abdullah AS, Fielding R, Hedley AJ. Understanding sexual risk taking behaviour in Hong Kong university students. A health promotion perspective. Prev Med 2003;37:311-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Milhausen RR, McKay A, Graham CA, Crosby RA, Yarber WL, Sanders SA. Prevalence and predictors of condom use in a national sample of Canadian university students. Canadian J Hum Sex 2013;22:142-51.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Boyer CB, Shafer MA, Pollack LM, Canchola J, Moncada J, Schachter J, et al. Sociodemographic markers and behavioral correlates of sexually transmitted infections in a nonclinical sample of adolescent and young adult women. J Infect Dis 2006;194:307-15.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Chlamydia (Chlamydia Trachomatis) - Report on Sexually Transmitted Infections in Canada: 2012 - Public Health Agency of Canada; 2015. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sti-its-surv-epi/rep-rap-2012/rep-rap-1-eng.php#a1.1. [Last accessed 2017 Mar 17].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Public Health Agency of Canada. HIV and AIDS in Canada: Surveillance Report to December 31, 2013. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2014. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/publication/survreport/2013/dec/index-eng.php. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 31].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Surveillance Manual HPV Vaccine Preventable Diseases CDC; 2014. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt05-hpv.html. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 1].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Statistics Canada. [Table 1]- Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2, by Selected Characteristics, Household Population Aged 14 to 59, Canada, 2009 to 2011; 2015. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2013004/article/11777/tbl/tbl1-eng.htm. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 25].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Population-Specific HIV/AIDS Status Report: Aboriginal Peoples. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Zhan W, Krasnoselskikh TV, Niccolai LM, Golovanov S, Kozlov AP, Abdala N, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships and sexually transmitted diseases in Russia. Sex Transm Dis 2011;38:543-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Gravata A, Castro R, Borges-Costa J. Study of the sociodemographic factors and risky behaviours associated with the acquisition of sexual transmitted infections by foreign exchange students in Portugal. Acta Med Port 2016;29:360-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Canadian Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2016. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Canadian Reference Group Data Report Spring 2016. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
National College Health Assessment (NCHA) Wellness Centre University of Calgary; 2016. Available from: http://www.ucalgary.ca/wellnesscentre/ncha. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 20].  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
About NCHA – Health Promotion-Ryerson University; 2016. Available from: http://www.ryerson.ca/healthandwellness/healthpromotion/About_NCHA/. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 20].  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
ACHA-NCHA Data; 2017. Available from: http://www.acha-ncha.org/. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 20].  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kerr D, Ding K, Burke A, Ott-Walter K. An alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use comparison of lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual undergraduate women. Subst Use Misuse 2015;50:340-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Smith LM, Kaufman JS, Strumpf EC, Lévesque LE. Effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on clinical indicators of sexual behaviour among adolescent girls: The Ontario grade 8 HPV vaccine cohort study. CMAJ 2015;187:E74-81.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken N.J: Wiley; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med 2008;3:17.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.
Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Acceptability of sexually transmitted infection testing using self-collected vaginal swabs among college women. J Am Coll Health 2013;61:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    
31.
Trends in Higher Education. Enrolment. Vol. 1. 1st ed. Ottawa, ON: The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada; 2011. Available from: https://www.univcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/trends-vol1-enrolment-june-2011.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 11].  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, Beddows S, Field N, Soldan K, Tanton C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: Findings from the national surveys of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet 2013;382:1795-806.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Fact Sheet: 10 Ways STDs Impact Women Differently From Men; 2011. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/health-disparities/stds-women-042011.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 11].  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Baldwin JI, Baldwin JD. Heterosexual anal intercourse: An understudied, high-risk sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 2000;29:357-73.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]    
35.
Benson LS, Martins SL, Whitaker AK. Correlates of heterosexual anal intercourse among women in the 2006-2010 national survey of family growth. J Sex Med 2015;12:1746-52.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Billy JO, Grady WR, Sill ME. Sexual risk-taking among adult dating couples in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009;41:74-83.  Back to cited text no. 36
[PUBMED]    
37.
Vasilenko SA, Lanza ST. Predictors of multiple sexual partners from adolescence through young adulthood. J Adolesc Health 2014;55:491-7.  Back to cited text no. 37
[PUBMED]    
38.
Baskin-Sommers A, Sommers I. The co-occurrence of substance use and high-risk behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2006;38:609-11.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    
39.
Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Spitznagel EL, Schootman M, Cottler LB, Bierut LJ, et al. Number of sexual partners and associations with initiation and intensity of substance use. AIDS Behav 2011;15:869-74.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Santelli JS, Brener ND, Lowry R, Bhatt A, Zabin LS. Multiple sexual partners among U.S. Adolescents and young adults. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:271-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Cooper ML. Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 2002;14:101-17.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Yan H, Chen W, Wu H, Bi Y, Zhang M, Li S, et al. Multiple sex partner behavior in female undergraduate students in china: A multi-campus survey. BMC Public Health 2009;9:305.  Back to cited text no. 42
[PUBMED]    
43.
Paul E, McManus B, Hayes A. “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. J Sex Res 2000;37:76-88.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Herold ES, Maticka-Tyndale E, Mewhinney D. Predicting intentions to engage in casual sex. J Soc Pers Relationsh 1998;15:502-16.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Islam MM, Topp L, Conigrave KM, van Beek I, Maher L, White A, et al. The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: Clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). AIDS Care 2012;24:1496-503.  Back to cited text no. 45
[PUBMED]    
46.
Phillips AE, Gomez GB, Boily MC, Garnett GP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative interviewing tools to investigate self-reported HIV and STI associated behaviours in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:1541-55.  Back to cited text no. 46
[PUBMED]    
47.
Graham CA, Catania JA, Brand R, Duong T, Canchola JA. Recalling sexual behavior: A methodological analysis of memory recall bias via interview using the diary as the gold standard. J Sex Res 2003;40:325-32.  Back to cited text no. 47
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1173    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded127    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]