• Users Online: 1103
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 112

Altmetric analysis of contemporary Iranian Medical Journals


1 Independent Research Scientist, Founder and Associate Editor of Dental Hypotheses, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Endodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Pediatrics, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission15-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance11-Apr-2019
Date of Web Publication12-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Jafar Kolahi
Independent Research Scientist, Founder and Associate Editor of Dental Hypotheses, No. 24, Faree 15, Pardis, Shahin Shahr, Isfahan 83179-18981
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_134_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Altmetrics is a newly emerging scholarly tool measuring online attention surrounding scientific research outputs. With respect to increasing demand of disseminating research findings on the World Wide Web, this study aims to analyze the altmetric statues of Iranian medical journals. Methods: On February 27, 2019, the list of Iranian medical journals extracted from http://journals.research.ac.ir/ and consequently altmetric data token out from Altmetric database (Altmetric LLP, London, UK). The science mapping done via keyword co-occurrence, co-citation and co-authorship, network analysis using the VOSviewer. The Pearson coefficient was then employed for the correlation analysis using R. Results: Among a total of 104 journals, 7518 articles were mentioned in Altmetric data resources (Mean: 72.28, Confidence Level (95.0%): 16.8), total mentions were 27577 (Mean: 265.16, Confidence Level (95.0%): 79.9). Considering the total mentions of articles, International Journal of Preventive Medicine achieved the first rank, followed by Journal of Research in Medical Sciences and Iranian Journal of Public Health. Notably, Twitter was the most popular altmetric resource followed by Facebook and news outlets. Tweets were generally from the United States and United Kingdom. Among top 5% popular Iranian medical articles multiple sclerosis, cancer, and anxiety was hot topics. Conclusions: Iranian biomedical journal editors and research scientists needs to be more dynamic in World Wide Web using social media, post-publication peer review tools, Stack Exchange (Q and A) sites, research highlight tools, Wikipedia, and etc. In spite, more attention to the concept of evidence-based policymaking, by Iranian government along with the health policymakers seems necessary.

Keywords: Altmetrics, Facebook, Iran, medical journal, social media, Twitter


How to cite this article:
Kolahi J, Khazaei S, Bidram E, Kelishadi R. Altmetric analysis of contemporary Iranian Medical Journals. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:112

How to cite this URL:
Kolahi J, Khazaei S, Bidram E, Kelishadi R. Altmetric analysis of contemporary Iranian Medical Journals. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20];10:112. Available from: http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2019/10/1/112/260240




  Introduction Top


Impact factor or h-index are the famous traditional citation-based metrics for the research scientists. However, altmetrics is a newly emerging scholarly tool, acts as a compliment to traditional citation-based bibliometrics, measuring online attention surrounding scientific research outputs.[1],[2],[3] Different data resources for altmetrics includes Twitter, Facebook, scientific blogs, news outlets, Google+, policy documents, post-publication peer reviews, F1000 prime, Wikipedia, Weibo, Reddit, Pinterest, patents, Video (e.g. YouTube), sites running Stack Exchange (Q and A) and others.[4] In contrast with slowly-progressive traditional citation-based metrics, altmetrics acts very fast, in which the majority of altmetric resources up-dated on a daily basis. In contrast, less than 50% of articles were cited before 3 years after publication.[5]

Among general and internal medical journals, the number of Twitter followers is strongly associated with impact factor and number of citations.[6] The number of Twitter mentions potentially forecast the highly cited articles, within the first 3 days of their publication.[7]

Of more interest, well-known medical research funders and charities, e.g. the Welcome Trust, attracted to altmetrics creating greater public engagement toward the research.[8] The altmetric status of neurosurgery journals,[9] radiology journals,[10] dental journals,[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] emergency medicine,[16] etc., has previously been analyzed.

Nevertheless, Iran experienced a great development in knowledge creation during the last decade.[17],[18],[19],[20] Polynomial trendline analysis of PubMed search results with the term of “Iran[Affiliation]” revealed the fast growing of the number of Iranian articles (y = 41.625x2-166263x + 2E + 08, R2 = 0.9632).

Hence, with respect to increasing demand of disseminating research findings on the World Wide Web among the scientist, this study aims to analyze the altmetric statues of Iranian medical journals.


  Methods Top


On February 27, 2019, a list of Iranian medical journals was extracted from http://journals.research.ac.ir/, and consequently altmetric data were derived from Altmetric database (Altmetric LLP, London, U.K.). Bibliometric data of Iranian popular medical articles and journals were retrieved from PubMed and Web of Science. The science mapping via keyword co-occurrence, co-citation and co-authorship network analysis was carried out using the VOSviewer 1.6.6 (www.vosviewer.com/, Leiden University Centre for Science and Technology Studies). The Pearson coefficient was also employed for the correlation analysis using Rattle (graphical user interface for data science in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/)). Graphs were drawn by Microsoft Office Excel 2016.


  Results Top


A total of 104 journals were found with Altmetric mentions, in which 7,518 articles were mentioned among Altmetric data resources (Mean: 72.28, Confidence Level (95.0%): 16.8), total mentions were 27577 (Mean: 265.16, Confidence Level (95.0%): 79.9) [Figure 1] and [Table 1]. Among top 5% (469 articles) popular articles, h-index was 25 and the average citations was 12.3 per item according to Web of Science.
Figure 1: Altmetric data of 104 Iranian medical journals. Please note the logarithmic scale of the left vertical axis. Box and whisker plots of data are shown on the right

Click here to view
Table 1: Data-bar visualization of the top 10 Iranian medical articles with the highest Altmetric scores

Click here to view


With respect to the total mentions of articles, International Journal of Preventive Medicine achieved the first rank, followed by Journal of Research in Medical Sciences and Iranian Journal of Public Health [Figure 2] and [Figure 3].
Figure 2: Altmetric data of top ten Iranian medical journals with the most online attention. Bubble sizes correspond to the number of Twitter mentions

Click here to view
Figure 3: Breakdown of the Altmetric data resources for top ten Iranian medical journals

Click here to view


Twitter was the most popular altmetric resource among Iranian medical journals followed by Facebook and news outlets [Figure 4], with the most Tweets generally from the United States and United Kingdom [Table 2].
Figure 4: Sum of scores of various Altmetric data resources among Iranian medical journals

Click here to view
Table 2: Demographic breakdown of top 10 countries with the greatest number of tweets related to Iranian medical articles

Click here to view


Among top 5% Iranian medical articles, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and anxiety listed as the most accruing keywords (hot topics) [Figure 5].
Figure 5: Hot topics among top 5% Iranian medical articles with the highest Altmetric scores. Red–yellow–green–blue color scheme was used; red corresponds to the highest keyword co-occurrence in density, and blue corresponds to the lowest density. The distance-based approach was used to create this map, which means the smaller the distance between two terms, the higher their relatedness

Click here to view


Co-citation network analysis illustrated American journal of clinical nutrition, Journal of nutrition and New England journal of medicine as the most affective journals on the network, considering the number of citations [Figure 6].
Figure 6: Co-citation network analysis among citation sources of the top 5% Iranian medical articles with the highest Altmetric scores. The network involved 48 nodes and 5 clusters which showed in different colors

Click here to view


Co-authorship network analysis displayed Askari G, Ghiasvand R and Khorvash F, had the most influence on the network considering number of articles [Figure 7].
Figure 7: Co-authorship network analysis of the top 5% Iranian medical articles with the highest Altmetric scores. The network involved 53 nodes and 6 clusters which showed in different colors

Click here to view


Altmetric score correlated with news mentions (r = 0.85) and did not correlate with citations (r = 0.005); yet Mendeley mentions correlated with citations (r = 0.80) [Figure 8].
Figure 8: Correlation matrix visualization between Altmetric score, citations, Mendeley readers and the main Altmetric data resources of top 5% Iranian medical articles with the highest Altmetric scores

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Number of social media users will increase to 3 billion by 2021 (http://bit.ly/2FsJVh4). Social media is a useful tool for dissemination of medical knowledge.[21] A good example would be Mayo Clinic Twitter account (@MayoClinic) with more than 1.89 million followers and 45600 tweets.[22] “Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism” published at Annals of Internal Medicine, March 2019, would be a good illustration to show the power of social media.[23] This article experience 10040 tweets from 9256 users, with an upper bound of 21,393,283 followers. Remarkably, 83% of tweets were carried out by members of the public, 8% by scientists, 7% by practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) and 2% by science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) (https://annals.altmetric.com/details/56459321).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to analyze the altmetric status of Iranian medical journals. Tweets and Facebook posts were the most prevalent altmetric resources, mostly from the United States and the United Kingdom, indicating the international popularity of Iranian journal research outputs. Disappointingly, well-known Iranian journals are not active in Twittersphere. Alongside of legal limitations, lack of knowledge and attitude among Iranian editors, mainly influenced this trend. Previous studies indicated journals with their own Twitter page, received 34 percent more citations and 46 percent more tweets than journals without a Twitter page.[24] Interestingly, highly tweeted articles were tweeted on the day of publication by corresponding journal accounts or accounts with a high number of followers, e.g. an academic society.[25]

Unacceptably, the newly emerging scholarly tools, such as, post-publication peer review (e.g. PubPeer)[26],[27],[28] and research highlight (e.g. F1000 Prime),[29] are not popular among Iranian medical journals. Stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency, or STAP might be the good examples showing the power of post-publication peer review; In January 2014, scientist from Japan and US published two articles in the NATURE stating embryonic-like stem cells could be generate by exposing adult body cells to stress, such as acidic conditions or physical pressure. Shortly critical post-publication peer reviews however, found several problems with STAP stem-cell claims and the articles finally retracted.[30]

Iranian medical journals were rarely cited by patents, showing a gap between Iranian medical research and industry. Entrepreneurship courses, funding practical researches and development of biomedical science and technology parks will be useful tools bridging this old gap.[31],[32],[33],[34]

Iranian medical community were not active in Wikipedia and Iranian medical articles rarely cited in Wikipedia. Of more interest, only English-language medical Wikipedia articles received additional to 2.4 billion visits in 2017.[35] Currently, the English Wikipedia develops at a rate 570 new daily articles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: Statistics). Moreover, the Cochrane and Wikipedia started working together in 2016 to disseminate trusted health information on World Wide Web (http://bit.ly/2Cm0IBB). Therefore, Wikipedia could be considered as a useful tool to publicize trusted medical knowledge by Iranian medical community.[36]

Considering principles of evidence-based policymaking,[37],[38],[39] Iranian medical research findings rarely used for policymaking. These results may involve bias, due to not availability of Iran's policy documents at Altmetric database, which strongly requires the Iranian health policymakers at government and parliaments' attention.[40]

Hot topic analysis illustrated emerging and groundbreaking issues, e.g. genomic medicine, nano-technology, tissue engineering, artificial intelligence, robotic surgery non-common among Iranian medical journals, which needs more consideration.

Based on this study there was no correlation between altmetric score and citation even with high h-index among popular Iranian articles. Same result reported for original research articles, published in specific high-impact general medicine journals,[41] cardiovascular articles,[42] emergency medicine,[16] radiology,[10] etc. Yet, some studies reported significant correlation between altmetrics and citations. In a large-scale study, a significant correlation was found between six altmetric resources (tweets, Facebook wall posts, research highlights, blog mentions, mainstream media mentions and forum posts) and citation counts.[43] A recent study covering six PLOS specialized journals, revealed a significant positive correlation between the normalized altmetric scores and normalized citations.[44]

Limitations of our study should be noted. First, altmetric analysis more fluctuates over time, compared to traditional indices. Second, the frequency of journal and number of articles in journal were not adjusted. In context, altmetrics might be a useful, complementary measure to evaluate the impact of research reporting in modern medicine and publication enterprise.

As a final point, Iranian medical journal editorial teams and biomedical research scientists, must go beyond boundaries of traditional citation-based metrics being more active in World Wide Web, while paying more attention to newly emerging scholarly tools, e.g. social media, post-publication peer review tools, Stack Exchange (Q and A) sites, research highlight tools, Wikipedia.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Altmetric LLP (London, U.K), particularly Mrs. Stacy Konkiel for her valued support and permitting us complete access to Altmetric data.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Warren HR, Raison N, Dasgupta P. The rise of altmetrics. JAMA 2017;317:131-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kolahi J. Altmetrics: A new emerging issue for dental research scientists. Dent Hypotheses 2015;6:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 2
  [Full text]  
3.
Melero R. Altmetrics-a complement to conventional metrics. Biochem medica 2015;25:152-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Konkiel S. What can altmetrics tell us about interest in dental clinical trials? Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:31.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Wang J. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics 2013;94:851-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cosco TD. Medical journals, impact and social media: An ecological study of the Twittersphere. CMAJ 2015;187:1353-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e123.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dinsmore A, Allen L, Dolby K. Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biol 2014;12:e1002003.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Wang J, Alotaibi NM, Ibrahim GM, Kulkarni AV, Lozano AM. The spectrum of altmetrics in neurosurgery: The top 100 “Trending” articles in neurosurgical journals. World Neurosurg 2017;103:883-895.e1.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rosenkrantz AB, Ayoola A, Singh K, Duszak R. Alternative metrics (“Altmetrics”) for assessing article impact in popular general radiology journals. Acad Radiol 2017;24:891-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014. BDJ 2016;220:569-74.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kolahi J, Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S. Altmetric analysis of 2015 dental literature: A cross sectional survey. BDJ 2017;222:695-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric analysis of contemporary dental literature. BDJ 2018;225:68-72.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kolahi J. Facebook and contemporary dental researches. Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:85-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
  [Full text]  
15.
Kolahi J. Dental research output in twittersphere. Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
  [Full text]  
16.
Barbic D, Tubman M, Lam H, Barbic S. An analysis of altmetrics in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2016;23:251-68.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kolahi J, Abrishami M. Contemporary remarkable scientific growth in Iran: House of wisdom will rise again. Dent Hypotheses 2013;4:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
  [Full text]  
18.
Kharabaf S, Abdollahi M. Science growth in Iran over the past 35 years. J Res Med Sci 2012;17:275-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Akhondzadeh S. Iranian science shows world's fastest growth: Ranks 17th in science production in 2012. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2013;5:139.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Iran is top of the world in science growth | New Scientist. Avaibale from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20291-iran-is-top-of-the-world-in-science-growth/. [Last accessed on 2018 Sep 14].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Saenger AK, Berkwits M, Carley S, Haymond S, Ennis-O'Connor M, Sherbino J, et al. The power of social media in medicine and medical education: Opportunities, risks, and rewards. Clin Chem 2018;64:1284-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Widmer RJ, Engler NB, Geske JB, Klarich KW, Timimi FK. An academic healthcare twitter account: The mayo clinic experience. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2016;19:360-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hviid A, Hansen JV, Frisch M, Melbye M. Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism. Ann Intern Med 2019. doi: 10.7326/M18-2101. [Epub ahead of print]  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ortega JL. The presence of academic journals on twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations). Aslib J Inf Manag 2017;69:674-87.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Zhang L, Wang J. Why highly cited articles are not highly tweeted? A biology case. Scientometrics 2018;117:495-509.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Gibson TA. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality. Nature 2007;448:408.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Knoepfler P. Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends Genet 2015;31:221-3.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Post-publication peer review: A fresh perspective on dentistry publications. Dent Hypotheses 2016;7:29-30.  Back to cited text no. 28
  [Full text]  
29.
F1000. What is F1000Prime-F1000Prime. http://f1000.com/prime/about/whatis. Published 2016.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
The rise and fall of STAP : Nature News and Comment. http://www.nature.com/news/stap-1.15332. [Last accessed on 2015 Dec 16].  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Kolahi J. Dental science and technology parks: Rethinking university-industry connections. Dent Hypotheses 2015;6:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 31
  [Full text]  
32.
Gelijns AC, Thier SO. Medical innovation and institutional interdependence. JAMA 2002;287:72.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Thon JN, Karlsson S. How scientists can become entrepreneurs. Trends Biochem Sci 2017;42:327-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Manbachi A, Kreamer-Tonin K, Walch P, Gamo NJ, Khoshakhlagh P, Zhang YS, et al. Starting a medical technology venture as a young academic innovator or student entrepreneur. Ann Biomed Eng 2018;46:1-13.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Murray H. More than 2 billion pairs of eyeballs: Why aren't you sharing medical knowledge on Wikipedia? BMJ Evid Based Med 2019;24:90-91.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Kolahi J, Iranmanesh P. Wikipedia and dental literature. Dent Hypotheses 2018;9:77-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
  [Full text]  
37.
Kolahi J. Evidence-based policymaking and contemporary dental researches. Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:55-6.  Back to cited text no. 37
  [Full text]  
38.
Yamey G, Feachem R. Evidence-based policymaking in global health-the payoffs and pitfalls. Evid Based Med 2011;16:97-9.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
The politics of evidence-based policymaking | Science | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/mar/10/the-politics-of-evidence-based-policymaking. [Last accessed on 2017 June 3].  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Vanlandingham G, Silloway T, Chang V. Evidence-Based Policymaking: A guide for effective government. A report from the Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative. http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2014/11/evidencebasedpolicymakingaguideforeffectivegovernment.pdf. Published 2014. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 30].  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Barakat AF, Nimri N, Shokr M, Mahtta D, Mansoor H, Masri A, et al. Correlation of altmetric attention score and citations for high-impact general medicine journals: A cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04838-6. [Epub ahead of print]  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Barakat AF, Nimri N, Shokr M, Mahtta D, Mansoor H, Mojadidi MK, et al. Correlation of altmetric attention score with article citations in cardiovascular research. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:952-3.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One 2013;8:e64841.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Huang W, Wang P, Wu Q. A correlation comparison between altmetric attention scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194962.  Back to cited text no. 44
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed469    
    Printed36    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded67    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]