• Users Online: 784
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 178

Anabolic androgenic steroid abuse and their health impacts: A cross-sectional study among body builders in a city of Eastern India


Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Date of Submission06-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance30-Jan-2018
Date of Web Publication09-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Lipilekha Patnaik
Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan deemed to be University, Sector.8, Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_524_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AASs), when taken in supraphysiologic doses, increase muscle strength and athletic performance. Evidence suggests that long-term use of AAS in supraphysiologic doses have adverse effects on health. Therefore, the study was conducted to find crude estimate of the prevalence of AAS use among attendees of the gymnasium, the factors that could have influenced them for AAS abuse and to assess the short- and long-term side effects as perceived by them. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in selected gymnasiums of a smart city of India using a predesigned and pretested questionnaire. Snowball sampling method was undertaken. The study was from July 2015 to June 2016. Informed written consent was taken. The analysis was done using SPSS v. 20.0. Results: Of 84 bodybuilders approached, 74 participants used AAS. All users were male with mean age of 26.5 + 0.55 years. The mean age of initiation of AAS abuse was 23 years, and 66.2% (49) were unmarried. Eighty-five percent (63) preferred injectable. Seventy percent (52) abusers were influenced by trainers for abuse. Most commonly abused was Nandrolone decanoate (55.4%). Seventy-three percent were not aware of any legal ban on steroids. Reported benefits include increased strength, muscle size, and power, while harms were increased acne, deepening of voice, swelling of feet, increased irritability, depressive thoughts, impaired judgment, panic disorder, and withdrawal effect. Conclusions: Frequency of ASS use was substantial among young bodybuilders. Awareness about side effects was not a deterrent factor. Abusers were highly influenced by coaches. Efforts should be made for preventing easy access to AAS.

Keywords: Fitness centers, steroids, substance-related disorders


How to cite this article:
Pany S, Panigrahi SK, Rao E V, Patnaik L, Sahu T. Anabolic androgenic steroid abuse and their health impacts: A cross-sectional study among body builders in a city of Eastern India. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:178

How to cite this URL:
Pany S, Panigrahi SK, Rao E V, Patnaik L, Sahu T. Anabolic androgenic steroid abuse and their health impacts: A cross-sectional study among body builders in a city of Eastern India. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 16];10:178. Available from: http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2019/10/1/178/268755




  Introduction Top


The anabolic-androgenic steroids (AASs) are a family of hormones that includes the natural male hormone testosterone together with its many synthetic relatives, all of which exhibit both anabolic (“muscle building”) and androgenic (“masculinizing”) properties.[1],[2],[3] When taken in supraphysiologic doses, AAS allows users to enhance muscle strength and athletic performance, often well beyond the limit attainable by natural means.[1],[4] The majority of illicit AAS users are not elite athletes; indeed, many are not competitive athletes at all, but simply individuals who want to become more muscular.[1] A recent meta-analysis estimated the lifetime prevalence of AAS abuse worldwide is 6.4% among men and 18.4% among recreational athletes.[5]

AAS abuse is commonly seen in the case of bodybuilders, weightlifters, and other athletes, to improve their performances, increase muscle growth and lean mass.[6],[7] Most individuals with current or past AAS use are young men.[1] A limitation of human studies is represented by the fact that information about the intake of AAS is generally self-reported and it is hardly possible to assess the exact dosage. Furthermore, AASs are used in combination with other drugs or substances (so-called “steroid-accessory drugs,” such as ephedrine, growth hormone, diuretics) for which it is difficult to separate their toxic effects.[6],[7] AASs are used in diseases, such as testosterone deficiency, malnutrition, aplastic anemia, hypogonadism, and delayed male puberty.[4] Insulin sensitivity is lowered by the use of AAS.[8] They can be administered orally, parenterally by intramuscular injection and transdermally.[2],[7],[9] The most common routes are oral and injectable routes.[7],[9]

Evidence suggests that long-term use of supraphysiologic doses of AAS may have adverse effects on several organ systems, leading to both medical and psychiatric pathology.[1] AAS adverse effects range from hirsutism, acne, clitoral enlargement and deepened voice in women to hypertension, heart hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, decreased high-density lipoprotein, fluid retention, liver failure, kidney damage, personality disturbance, mood fluctuation, prostatic hypertrophy, and certain cancers.[1],[10],[11]

The researchers hence did this study to find reasons that could influence bodybuilders for AAS abuse, and the possible side effects they might have encountered during use. Simultaneously, a crude estimate of the prevalence of the AAS use could also be done. Therefore, the study was conducted to know the factors that could have influenced the bodybuilders for AAS abuse and to assess the short- and long-term side effects as perceived by them.


  Methods Top


It was a cross-sectional study conducted in selected gymnasiums of Bhubaneswar which is the capital city of Odisha, India, for 12 months (July 2015–June 2016). Persons attending gymnasium with a basic purpose of bodybuilding and professional bodybuilders who had given consent were included in the study. Persons not willing to participate in the study and those attending gymnasium for body fitness (such as yoga, aerobics, and weight loss) were excluded from the study.

Data were collected using a predesigned, pretested schedule developed from available tools. Content validity was done by experts in the field from the Department of Biochemistry, Pharmacology, and Endocrinology.

Snowball sampling method was used to identify AAS abusers. The gymnasium of a University was the starting point for snowball sampling. AAS abusers identified at each level were asked to suggest the names of other AAS abusers known to them. The first and the second case were identified by the lead investigator as two bodybuilders in the gymnasium. Both the cases led to subsequent cases and name of gymnasium they were attending. The end of the study was taken as the point where no cases were detected from the sampled gymnasiums. In this way, 87 AAS abusers were approached, and 13 were excluded who either fell into the category of exclusion or did not give consent for the study. In this way, a total of 74 participants were included in the study.

Data were cleaned on the day of data collection and entered into Excel sheet on the same day. The data thus collected were processed and analyzed using SPSS v20.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and wherever necessary through manual calculation.

Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee of IMS and SUM Hospital. Informed and written consent was taken from the participants. Confidentiality was ensured at all stages. Participants were informed about the right to discontinue participation at any time during the interview without giving reasons, and that refraining should not influence their individual care.


  Results Top


A total of 87 AAS abusers were approached and 13 were excluded. Hence, the results presented in the study were drawn from 74 participants [Figure 1]. The mean age of the participants was 26.5 ± 0.55 years and all were male. Among them, 66.2% were unmarried. The average family size was 5 and median family income of INR 20,000 (interquartile range [IQR]: 12,000–30,000). Maximum participants were students 18.9% and only one participant was exclusively a bodybuilder by profession. Mean age of initiation of AAS use was 23 years.
Figure 1: Sampling method of study participants

Click here to view


Many study participants, i.e., 67.6% (50) did not have regular health check-up although some of them did certain laboratory investigations on their own. Those having health checkup visited a physician once in a month or two. Most of the participants, i.e., 74.3% (55) did not assess health parameters (such as blood and urine tests) regularly and only a quarter of them i.e., 25.74% (19) did assess their health parameters, infrequently.

The mean days of gymnasium attendance were 5.14 ± 0.42 months among the AAS abusers. The mean age of onset of steroid abuse is 22.99 ± 0.33 years. The median number of steroids abused by the participants was two (IQR = 2–3).

Maximum participants (85.1%, 63) preferred using AAS in injectable form followed by oral (40.5%, 30) and transdermal (6.7%, 5). Only injectable abusers were 55.4% (41) while oral abusers were 14.8% (11). None of the AAS abusers used transdermally singly (it was always used in combination). The combination of oral and injectable form was used by 22.9% (17); injectable and transdermal form by three; and oral, injectable, and transdermal form by two of the participants.

Majority of the participants (81.1%) used steroids regularly. Regularly, irregular pattern was found to be present in 16.2% (12) cases while 2.7% (2) used in irregularly irregular pattern. While exploring the purpose behind steroid abuse, it was found that 19.9% (27) of the participants used AAS for bulking up, followed by shredding 22.9% (17), attaining competitions 21.6% (16), and maintenance of existing physique 18.9% (14). However, the reason for the use of multiple AAS simultaneously could not be assessed it was assumed that combination of AAS produced synergistic effect.

All the participants used additional supplements such as proteins, pre/postworkouts, mass gainers, amino acids, creatinine supplements (chemical forms such as creatinine anhydride and monohydrate), and fat burners concurrently to AAS. Proteins and amino acid supplement users were the largest (62.1%, 46) followed by pre-/intra-/post-workout drinks (23.0%, 17) and creatinine (14.9%, 11).

Apart from these human growth hormones (HGH), female steroid hormone (FSH) (like progesterone and estrogen), insulin (rapid and long-acting), triiodothyronine, and clenbuterol were used by the study participants. HGH was most commonly used (11, 14.86%) followed by FSH use (5, 6.75%). Some participants (27, 36.48%) used some over the counter pharmaceutical drugs in addition. Dexamethasone was most commonly used (10, 13.5%) followed by Metformin (9, 12.16%), Cyproheptadine (7, 9.45%), Tribulus Terrestris (4, 5.4%), and Prednisolone (2, 2.7%) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Representing use of additional pharmaceutical drugs along with anabolic-androgenic steroids

Click here to view


Majority of participants, i.e., Seventy percent (52) were persuaded by trainers for AAS use, while 17.5% (13) were persuaded by peers. Some used by self-learning (4, 5.4%), using sources such as Internet and magazines. A meager number participant consulted health-care professionals (6.75%, 5) before abusing AAS. Among all the participants, 47.3% (35) had received guidance from multiple sources (gymnasium trainer, peers, and self-learning).

The frequently used steroids were listed and among them it was found that Nandrolone/deca durabolin was most commonly used (41, 55.4%) followed by testosterone/sustanon (29, 39.2%), methandienone/Dianabol (27, 36.48%), stanozolol/winstrol (22, 29.72%), boldenone/equipoise (19, 25.67%), oxandrolone/anavar (11, 14.86%), trenbolone/parabola (8, 10.81%), and oxymetholone/anadrol (6, 8.10%) [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Most commonly used anabolic-androgenic steroids by study subjects

Click here to view


While interrogating on knowledge about the legal ban on steroid abuse, it was found that 27% (20) users were aware of some sort of legal ban on steroids while the remaining majority (54, 73%) were not aware.

There were observed beneficial and harmful effects of AAS as reported by the abusers. The most common benefits included improved muscle size, appetite, strength, and power; while the most common harms included panic disorders, insomnia, acne, and hair loss from the scalp. The effects and the time for the effect to appear have been presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids and the time for the effect to appear as perceived abusers

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our study, the AAS abusers belonged to mid-twenties and mostly unmarried. According to Sagoe et al., 3.9% of men reported lifetime use of AAS, 1.4% use during the past 12 months and 0.4% AAS use during the past 30 days.[12] Injectable form of abuse was rampant followed by oral, while transdermal form was less acceptable because of a presumption that it does not get inside the body. Combination of steroids was taken in different forms, doses, and cycles. Steroid abusers typically used to “stack” the drugs, meaning that they used to simultaneously take two or more AAS, of different forms (oral/injectable/topical) and sometimes even including compounds that are meant for veterinary use. The idea behind taking combination steroids is that they interact to produce an effect on muscle size that is greater than the effects of each drug individually, a theory that has not been tested scientifically.[2] These findings of taking multiple drugs at one time are also similarly depicted in other studies.[13] Often, steroid abusers were found to “pyramid” their doses in cycles of weeks to months. In this, at the beginning of a cycle, the abuser starts with low doses and then increases the dose. In the second half of the cycle, the doses are tapered. Abusers believe that pyramiding allows the body to adjust to high doses and the drug-free cycle allows the body's hormonal and immune system to recuperate.[2],[14],[15]

By 1970s, bodybuilding had gained its popularity.[1],[3] Fitness and bodybuilding magazines, usually with a male model on front cover, began to proliferate, and increasing numbers of young men became aware of the dramatic muscle gains that they could achieve with AAS.[1],[11] The main persuasion for the use of AAS was from gymnasium trainers along with encouragement and support from peers. However, other studies have reported peer pressure to be an important persuasion for AAS abuse.[15] The Internet proved a handy resource providing knowledge on cycling patterns and usage guidelines. The purpose for many abusers was to build a muscular physique, a shredded or bulkier look based on their vision about their role model. The number of steroid abuse at one time ranged from two to three as reported in similar articles.[16],[17] The most commonly abused AAS was Nandrolone decanoate followed by Testosterone and Methandienone, and these are known to promote muscle bulk.

Many participants were unaware of legal ban on steroids and others even knowing about the stringency of law regarding AAS abused it. There were observed short- and long-term health effects of AAS abuse.[15],[18] Some beneficiary effects were increased strength, power, muscle size, healing, and appetite with a decreasing percentage of body fat. The harmful effects were increased acne, deepening of voice, increased body, and facial hairs, swelling of feet and body.[10],[15],[16] There was increased irritability, depressive thoughts among many participants. Some reported impaired judgment, panic disorder, and withdrawal effect. A minority of participants even reported issues such as altered sex drive and erectile dysfunction. These findings have also been documented in other studies.[6],[10],[15],[19]


  Conclusions Top


Results show that frequency of ASS use is high among young bodybuilders. Awareness of side effects of AAS and education may not be a deterrent factor for their abuse. In-depth research is needed to understand the psychology for the commencement of the abuse and to investigate underlying and psychological reasons for AAS use. Abusers are highly influenced by groups and coaches. Efforts should be also expanded for prevention of the easy access to these drugs.

Limitations

The assessment of AAS side effects was not objective but was only based on reports by the abusers. This is a major limitation. The exact doses of steroid abuse were not assessed, and the knowledge level about the harms of AAS abuse has also not been assessed. The study is only a one time (cross-sectional) study and more research is necessary.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Pope HG Jr. Long-term psychiatric and medical consequences of anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse: A looming public health concern? Drug Alcohol Depend 2008;98:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
NIDA Research Report Series: Anabolic Steroid Abuse, NIH Publication Number 00-3721, 1991, Reprinted 1994, 1996. Available from: http://www.ehd.org ' Health Articles ' Substance Abuse ' Steroids. [Last revised on 2000 Apr].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Pope HG Jr. Illicit anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Horm Behav 2010;58:111-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hassan AF, Kamal MM. Effect of exercise training and anabolic androgenic steroids on hemodynamics, glycogen content, angiogenesis and apoptosis of cardiac muscle in adult male rats. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2013;7:47-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sagoe D, Molde H, Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. The global epidemiology of anabolic steroid use. International Journal of Epidemiology 2015;44 Suppl 1:120. [Abstract#:2190].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Aparicio VA, Sánchez C, Ortega FB, Nebot E, Kapravelou G, Porres JM, et al. Effects of the dietary amount and source of protein, resistance training and anabolic-androgenic steroids on body weight and lipid profile of rats. Nutr Hosp 2013;28:127-36.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Frati P, Busardò FP, Cipolloni L, Dominicis ED, Fineschi V. Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) related deaths: Autoptic, histopathological and toxicological findings. Curr Neuropharmacol 2015;13:146-59.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rasmussen JJ, Schou M, Selmer C, Johansen ML, Gustafsson F, Frystyk J, et al. Insulin sensitivity in relation to fat distribution and plasma adipocytokines among abusers of anabolic androgenic steroids. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017;87:249-56.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Cooper CJ, Noakes TD, Dunne T, Lambert MI, Rochford K. A high prevalence of abnormal personality traits in chronic users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:246-50.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Razavi Z, Moeini B, Shafiei Y, Bazmamoun H. Prevalence of anabolic steroid use and associated factors among body-builders in Hamadan, West Province of Iran. J Res Health Sci 2014;14:163-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
van Amsterdam J, Opperhuizen A, Hartgens F. Adverse health effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2010;57:117-23.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sagoe D, McVeigh J, Bjørnebekk A, Essilfie MS, Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, et al. Polypharmacy among anabolic-androgenic steroid users: A descriptive metasynthesis. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2015;10:12.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Leifman H, Rehnman C, Sjöblom E, Holgersson S. Anabolic androgenic steroids – Use and correlates among gym users – An assessment study using questionnaires and observations at gyms in the stockholm region. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8:2656-74.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Anabolic Steroids. Center for Substance Abuse Research. University of Maryland; 2013. Available from: http://www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/steroids.asp. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 20].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Daniel IM. Knowledge, attitude and practice on drug abuse among sports men and women in Lagos state, Nigeria. Int J Med Med Sci 2012;2:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kersey RD. Anabolic-androgenic steroid use among California Community College student-athletes. J Athl Train 1996;31:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zomorodian K, Rahimi MJ, Taheri M, Ghanbari Asad A, Khani S, Ahrari I, et al. The cutaneous bacterial microflora of the bodybuilders using anabolic-androgenic steroids. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2015;8:e12269.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tahtamouni LH, Mustafa NH, Alfaouri AA, Hassan IM, Abdalla MY, Yasin SR, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse among Jordanian Collegiate students and athletes. Eur J Public Health 2008;18:661-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Abrahin OS, Souza NS, Sousa EC, Moreira JK, Nascimento VC. Prevalence of the use of anabolic androgenic steroids by physical education students and teachers who work in health clubs. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2013;19:27-30.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed185    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]