• Users Online: 146
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 197

The association between maternal dietary protein intake and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus


1 Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission04-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance29-May-2019
Date of Web Publication06-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Mohammadreza Vafa
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_86_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: The amount and type of dietary protein affect glucose metabolism. However, the association between dietary protein intake and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk is vague. We examined this association. Methods: We included 152 GDM and 168 non-GDM participants (total 320), age 18–45 years from Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Protein intake was ascertained from 168-item Food Frequency Questionnaire at 24–40 weeks' gestation. GDM was defined as fasting blood sugar >95 mg/dL and/or oral glucose tolerance test >155 mg/dL. Dietary data were assessed using N4 software and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21. We tested the association between the amount of protein consumed from red and processed meat, poultry, dairy, egg, seafood, and vegetable plus sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates and GDM risk using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: There was a significant association between the physical activity (P < 0.035), socioeconomic status (P < 0.013), body mass index, age, and each trimester's weight (P < 0.001), and risk of GDM. No significant association was observed between the intake of protein from major protein sources and risk of GDM. The only significant association was observed for egg consumption which was lower in GDM participants (P = 0.004), yet this association turned nonsignificant after adjustment for confounders, except for the fourth quartile (odds ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.208, 0.893). Conclusions: According to our findings, dietary intake of total and major protein sources could not affect the GDM risk. Differences between Iranian and Western population and the reverse causality might be the main reasons for this nonsignifi cant association.

Keywords: Animal protein, diet, dietary protein, gestational diabetes mellitus, vegetable protein


How to cite this article:
Hezaveh ZS, Feizy Z, Dehghani F, Sarbakhsh P, Moini A, Vafa M. The association between maternal dietary protein intake and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:197

How to cite this URL:
Hezaveh ZS, Feizy Z, Dehghani F, Sarbakhsh P, Moini A, Vafa M. The association between maternal dietary protein intake and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 8];10:197. Available from: http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2019/10/1/197/270436




  Introduction Top


Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the state of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy.[1] Various diagnostic criteria are in use in different countries because of the wide range in the GDM prevalence,[2] such as International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups and World Health Organization which are commonly used to diagnose GDM in high-risk pregnant women.[3] In Iran though, GDM is diagnosed at 24–28 weeks of gestation with a fasting plasma glucose level >95 mg/dL and/or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) >155 mg/dL.[4] The prevalence of GDM is 1%–14% worldwide[5] and has been reported to be between 1.25% and 29.9% in Iran.[6] GDM is not only associated with adverse consequences for mothers but also causes complications for their children. Mothers are exposed to the increased risk of delivering macrosomic babies and 7-fold risk of developing diabetes (especially type 2 diabetes) later in life[7] and their babies are at risk of increased adiposity, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in childhood, adverse cardiometabolic profile, and earlier onset of puberty among girls.[8]

Lifestyle and diet are two modifiable risk factors associated with GDM.[9] Dietary carbohydrate and fat intake have been reported to be associated with GDM;[10],[11] however, a few studies have investigated the role of dietary protein intake in this matter.

Many studies have examined the dietary protein intake in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Most of those studies demonstrated that the higher animal protein intake, especially red meat, is positively associated with the risk of T2DM, yet vegetable protein sources showed a negative association.[12],[13] The same result was concluded for the risk of GDM,[14] although different results have been observed in different populations with different dietary patterns. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet pattern of eating, which is consisted of less red meat and more fish, poultry, and vegetable protein sources, was associated with lower risk of GDM.[15] In the United States, different studies came up with different results. One study demonstrated that protein-dense foods, such as red meat and dairy, were not associated with the risk of GDM,[16] but some other studies found an association between animal protein intake and GDM.[17],[18] An Asian study suggested that a higher intake of dietary protein from both animal and vegetable sources is associated with a higher risk of developing GDM.[19]

Different results in previous studies might be explained by differences in race and ethnicity between populations, controlling different confounders, retrospective or prospective design, and various sample sizes. Limited investigation on the relationship between the protein intake and risk of developing GDM plus such contradictory results among the existing studies persuaded us to examine the association of dietary intake of protein from major dietary sources during pregnancy with the risk of GDM.


  Materials and Methods Top


Participants

During the period of August through December 2017, this case–control study was performed at Arash's Women Hospital, Tehran, Iran, to which women from all over the country are referred to receive advanced and cheap services of this governmental hospital. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.FMD.REC 1396.9411323007. 9/18/2017). A total sample size of 320 individuals was calculated using data from Zhang et al.'s[20] study and using STATA14 software with 80% power and 95% confidence interval. Mothers age 18–40 years were assigned to the case (n = 152) and control (n = 168) groups at 24–40 weeks of gestation. Women who were waiting in the hospital's clinic to be visited by the doctors were asked to participate. To prevent selection bias, the control group was recruited from the same catchment area as the cases. All participants signed a written informed consent and went through face-to-face interview by trained interviewers using written questionnaires. Women were excluded from this study if they had a family history of diabetes, a history of GDM, stillbirth, macrosomia, and congenital anomalies or they have had abortion in their previous pregnancies, hypothyroidism, smoking or drinking habit, height <148 cm, multiple pregnancy, pregnancy throughin vitro fertilization, and consumption of drugs affecting serum glucose such as progesterone, glucocorticoids, chemotherapy, or psychotropic drugs. Noncompliance to the exclusion criteria was self-reported. Also, we have excluded women who provided incomplete Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) data or over- or underestimated the energy intake (<800 or >4,500 kcal/day) [Figure 1]. Overall, a total of 320 participants (152 with and 168 without diabetes) remained for the final analyses.
Figure 1: Excluded participants

Click here to view


GDM was defined as fasting glucose level >95 mg/dL and/or OGTT >155 mg/dL.[4]

Demographic and anthropometric measures

Trained interviewers collected the information, including age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain in each trimester, socioeconomic status, education, career, child's birth order, drug and supplement consumption, and fasting blood sugar (FBS) and OGTT values. Weight was measured to the nearest 100 g using digital scales, while the participants were minimally clothed, without shoes. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm, in a standing position without shoes, using a tape meter. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of the height (m2). Data on gestational weight gain in each trimester, socioeconomic status, education, career, child's birth order, drug and supplement consumption, and FBS and OGTT values were also provided by the mothers themselves, or derived from their medical record. We also controlled physical activity as a confounder using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire which is validated for the Iranian population.[21] This questionnaire is consisted of four sections: sedentary, moderate, intense activities, and jogging. Each section is scored according to its frequency and dedicated time during the past week.

Assessment of dietary intake

Dietary data were collected using a 168-item FFQ. Reliability and validity of this questionnaire were assessed in 2012 by Asghari et al.[22] The questionnaires that were administered by trained interviewers represent their dietary intake over the past year (including both pregnancy and prepregnancy time duration). Serving size of each food item was reported by the mothers using the common kitchen utensils (e.g. bowl, spoon). Then, these serving sizes were converted to the amount (g) consumed using the conversion factors for each food item. Entering the amounts into the Nutritionist4 (N4) software, we calculate the amount of macro- and micronutrients received. Dietary intake of protein from red and processed meat, poultry, dairy, egg, seafood, and vegetable plus total protein intake was calculated and analyzed separately [Table 1].
Table 1: Food items taken into account for each food group

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Normality of the data was investigated by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The data were reported as mean ± SD for variables with normal distribution and median (interquartile range) for non-normal ones. The independent-samples t-test (normal distribution) or Mann–Whitney U-test (non-normal distribution) was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical variables between the two groups. Besides, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between GDM and dietary protein intake with adjustment for confounding variables which were selected from a bivariate analysis. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


  Results Top


Comparison between continuous demographic characteristics of the case and control groups is shown in [Table 2]. Based on our results, overweight and obese women tend to overtake GDM during pregnancy. Age and each trimester's weight were also significantly higher in GDM women (P< 0.001). Women with GDM had significantly lower physical activity compared with the control group (P < 0.03). Dietary confounders including energy, carbohydrate, fat, fiber, fruit, and vegetable intake were not significantly different between the two groups. Except for egg whose intake was significantly lower in the GDM group, other protein sources' intake was not different between GDM and non-GDM participants.
Table 2: Demographic characteristics

Click here to view


As the table shows, there were no significant differences between participants with and without GDM controlling for mother's educational level or the child's birth order. However, there was a significant association between the GDM and non-GDM groups in socioeconomic status (P < 0.013), although it does not follow a specific pattern. This variable was defined by the self-report of participants.

In this study, the mean energy provided from protein was 13.7%, 10.6% of this percentage was from animal and 1.6% from vegetable protein. The median intake of total dietary protein was 11.98%, 12.88%, 13.77%, and 15.62% of energy from the lowest to the highest quartile, respectively. After adjustment for age, BMI, mother's education, socioeconomic status, birth order of the child, and gestational age, total protein intake was not significantly associated with GDM risk. Similarly, we observed no significant association between the amount of protein met from major protein sources including red and processed meat, poultry, dairy, egg, seafood, and vegetable and risk of GDM [Table 3]. Among the major protein sources, highest protein intake was from dairy versus the lowest level of intake from seafood protein. Although it was not statistically significant, the higher intake of protein from egg seems to protect against GDM [from odds ratio (OR): 0.677, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35, 1.27, in quartile 2, to OR: 0.43, 95% CI (0.20, 0.89) in quartile 4]. This association was significant in the fourth quartile (P < 0.024).
Table 3: ORs for GDM according to intake of dietary protein during pregnancy

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our case–control study, we observed no significant relationship between the maternal protein intake and risk of GDM. This nonsignificant relationship applies not only to total protein but also to the red and processed meat, poultry, dairy, and seafood protein as well. Meanwhile, in the nonadjusted model, egg consumption had a negative significant association with GDM risk. In the adjusted model, there was a trend of decreasing risk of GDM by increasing egg consumption, and those in the fourth quartile had a lower risk of GDM by 57%.

We did not observe a significant association between animal protein intake and risk of GDM. Our findings are different from that of Nurses' Health Study II cohort which found significant association between total meat intake and the risk of GDM,[17] and a meta-analysis of cohort studies which reported 41% and 21% increased risk of T2DM for the highest versus lowest intake of processed meat and red meat, respectively.[23] This inconsistency might be due to the red and processed meat consumption in the United States, which is consumed at more than three times the global average,[24] adding pork meat intake to their calculations, and their participants to have been older than ours. However, Kurotani et al. did not find any significant relationship between red meat consumption and T2DM in women.[25] A mechanism to explain the adverse association of red meat intake and diabetes is the effect of heme-iron derived from it. Iron is a strong prooxidant and increases the level of oxidative stress which can damage many tissues, including the pancreatic beta cells.[26] In our study though, all mothers received the iron supplement. In fact, iron deficiency is of high prevalence in Iranian pregnant women.[27] Therefore, this might be a reason for us not to have observed a significant relationship. In addition, the mean intake of meat in our study population was very scant (17.52 ± 14.92 g/day). This low intake inhibits both red and processed meat to affect GDM significantly.

Poultry intake was also not significantly associated with the risk of GDM. Some studies reported an increased risk,[28] some reported a decreased risk,[29] and some observed no significant association between the poultry intake and risk of T2DM similar to our findings.[30] Poultry seems to have both promotive and protective correlation with diabetes. Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in poultry can improve insulin sensitivity,[31] and it may not significantly increase iron storage;[26] on the other hand, it contains branched chain amino acids which cause insulin resistance. This may lead to the neutral association between the poultry intake and risk of GDM.

The consumption of seafood protein did not differ between the case and the control groups. The results of several epidemiologic studies and meta-analysis[19],[32] on this topic were inconsistent. A Chinese study found that higher protein intake from seafood could protect against T2DM,[32] while Nurses' Health Study II found no association between fish intake and the incidence of GDM.[17] This inconsistency may reflect different preparation methods. Fried fish was not significantly associated with T2DM risk in the UK study due to production of trans fatty acids, which might modify the beneficial effect of fish, but a higher boiled fish intake was associated with a lower risk of T2D in the same population.[33] The type of fish or seafood consumed, geographical differences, and environmental contamination of the sea may also be the reason for the incompatible results.[34] Furthermore, significant association was observed mostly in the studies which introduced seafood as a source of long-chain PUFA[35] or vitamin D,[36] while few studies considered the protein content of it. Another explanation for our nonsignificant result is the low consumption of fish in our population. The amount of protein received from fish was very low (1.48 ± 2.99) in our participants and it may have not been enough to affect the glucose tolerance or insulin sensitivity.

Some studies found no association between the intake of vegetable protein and the risk of both T2DM[37] and GDM,[20] yet there are studies having observed a negative[17] or positive[19] relationship. Despite the fact that vegetables contain various vitamins and minerals and are a great source of fiber and they can reduce the risk of diabetes by reducing inflammation,[38] we found a nonsignificant relationship between the GDM risk and vegetable protein consumption. In this study, vegetable protein consists of two groups of food items: legums and nuts. In Iranian population, legumes are seldom used alone and are mostly consumed as part of the stew, mixed with other vegetables and meat and are eaten with rice or bread. Previous investigations suggest that amino acids absorbed after ingestion of a mixed meal are not likely to contribute significantly to insulin secretion.[39] Nuts are also known to decrease the risk of T2DM due to their fiber, magnesium, and monounsaturated fatty acids content.[40] However, the Iranians consume nuts occasionally and roasted with a great amount of salt. Studies investigating the relationship between the salt intake and risk of GDM and T2DM indicate that higher salt intake leads to diabetes by causing increased glucose absorption, high blood pressure, obesity, and inflammatory cytokines.[41] Perhaps the effect of salt counteracted the beneficial effects of nuts in our study.

According to our results, dairy protein does not significantly affect the GDM risk. Our result contrasts with previous studies, in which dairy consumption was generally associated with a lower risk of T2DM,[42] but our findings are consistent with a cohort study in which they found no significant relationship between dairy protein intake and the risk of GDM.[43] One possible explanation for our result is that we did not separately investigate the effect of low-fat and high-fat dairy in spite of their distinct association with diabetes mellitus.[44] Adjustment for possible confounders such as saturated fat intake could have changed our results. Besides, as dairy consumption in the Iranian population is lower than the recommended amount,[45] it is possible that we have missed the possible protective effect of dairy on GDM risk.

In the nonadjusted model, our results indicate that a higher intake of egg protects against GDM. There have been studies showing the adverse effect of egg consumption on T2DM,[46] but most of those studies which blame egg as an important contributor of dietary cholesterol and a serum cholestrol elevator were mostly conducted in the United States and were considered as low-quality studies due to self-reported diabetes and the follow-up rate which was inadequate or not described.[47] However, better quality studies in other populations were less likely to find an association between egg consumption and diabetes risk. Even relatively large increments in dietary cholesterol intake have shown to have little effect on total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.[48] In fact, dietary cholestrol affects serum cholestrol only in participants with abnormal lipid profile.[49] In our study population though, the egg is mostly regarded as a source of protein rather than cholestrol and it meets an impressive amount of protein needs in low-income families. There are also human experimental studies which showed that increased egg intake has rather a beneficial impact on several risk factors for T2DM, such as insulin resistance[50] and inflammation.[51] Furthermore, studies in which a positive significant result was observed showed a dose–response relationship and claimed that high maternal egg intake was related to diabetes risk, only if the egg consumption was higher than seven eggs/week while there was no significant association in lower amounts of egg consumption.[52],[53] As our participants' average egg intake was two eggs/week, not having observed a positive association is logical.

Aligned with major protein sources, total protein intake was also not related to the GDM risk. This is against cohort and meta-analysis studies which found significant association between the intake of protein and GDM[19] and T2DM.[54] Considering the food pattern instead of one macronutrient per se could be a possible reason for this contradictory result.[12] According to the demographic characteristics of the participants, it is also possible that unhealthy lifestyle is more effective on the GDM risk than diet alone. A study in the United States indicated that smoking is often associated with lower physical activity and higher intake of red meat.[47] Diet acts as a marker of a healthy lifestyle too, and since the amount of protein consumed by our participants was lower than the recommended amount, the nonsignificant result was not unexpected. Most importantly, the majority of women with GDM have beta-cell dysfunction on a background of chronic insulin resistance to which the insulin resistance of pregnancy is added.[55] Therefore, protein intake during pregnancy may only slightly affect this long-term dysfunction.

In general, our study was different from studies that found a significant association in many aspects. Those studies were mostly prospective cohorts with huge sample size and long years of follow-up, while this was a retrospective case–control study with a smaller sample size. The amount of energy met by protein was also lower in our study (13.7%) in comparison to previous studies and it was less than the recommended amount. Hence, the amount of protein consumed has been so low that it only supplied the basic needs of the body and has not been able to affect the glucose metabolism. In confirmation to this fact, we observed a significant association between egg intake and GDM risk in the fourth quartile where the highest amount of energy was met by protein (15.62%).A clinical trial in which healthy diet with emphasize on 15%–20% of total energy intake from protein was prescribed reported a decrease in pregnancy-induced insulin increment and insuline resistance during pregnancy.[56]

There are limitations to this study. First, using FFQ which is prone to recall bias, since individuals are asked to report their intake retrospectively and usually refer to prolonged period of time (last year). In addition, mothers were interviewed after the 24th week of pregnancy when they were already informed whether they had GDM. This awareness could have affected the report of their dietary intake. Another defect is that although we controlled for confounding by known risk factors of GDM, not having controlled the effect of some confounders such as the amount of iron, saturated and unsaturated fat separately, and salt intake might have resulted in an attenuated association. The causality is also unclear in case–control studies, which leaves us in doubt whether the protein intake causes GDM, or the chronic insulin resistance affects the protein consumption.

The strengths of this study include the division of protein into seven different groups and interpretation of each solely. We also adjusted the results for many confounders such as physical activity which had not been taken into account in previous studies. It is also one of the pioneer studies to investigate the relationship between dietary protein intake and risk of GDM in pregnant women. As another strength, we should mention choosing the Arash's women hospital for sampling. This referral hospital allowed us to include women from different cities, with different levels of education and wealth in our study. Although our results cannot be generalized to the whole population of pregnant women because of our multiple exclusion criteria.

In conclusion, according to our findings and in contrast to that of previous studies in Western population, the intake of total and major dietary sources was not significantly associatedwith the risk of GDM. For future research, we suggest to study this relationship in related Iranian cohorts with bigger sample size and stronger analysis to determine whether such association exists.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the participants of this study for their collaboration.

Financial support and sponsorship

The Vice Chancellor for Research of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (96-02-27-31413).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Metzger BEe. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998;21:B1-167.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hosseini E, Janghorbani M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus with one-step or two-step approaches and associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstetr 2018;143:137-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Meththananda Herath HM, Weerarathna TP, Weerasinghe NP. Is risk factor-based screening good enough to detect gestational diabetes mellitus in high-risk pregnant women? A Sri Lankan experience. Int J Prev Med 2016;7:99.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Soheilykhah S, Rashidi M, Mojibian M, Dara N, Jafari F. An appropriate test for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011;27:785-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32(Suppl 1):S13-61.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sharifi N, Dolatian M, Mahmoodi Z, Nasrabadi FM. Gestational diabetes and its relationship with social determinants of health according to World Health Organization model: Systematic review. Iran J Obstetr Gynecol Infertil 2017;19:6-18.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Baz B, Riveline JP, Gautier JF. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. Eur J Endocrinol 2016;174:R43-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Catalano PM, Kirwan JP, Haugel-De Mouzon S, King J. Gestational diabetes and insulin resistance: Role in short- and long-term implications for mother and fetus. J Nutr 2003;133(Suppl. 1):1674S-83S.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Zhang C, Ning Y. Effect of dietary and lifestyle factors on the risk of gestational diabetes: Review of epidemiologic evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:1975S-9S.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Saldana TM, Siega-Riz AM, Adair LS. Effect of macronutrient intake on the development of glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:479-86.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bowers K, Tobias DK, Yeung E, Hu FB, Zhang C. A prospective study of prepregnancy dietary fat intake and risk of gestational diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:446-53.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sluijs I, Beulens JWJ, Van Der A DL, Spijkerman AM, Grobbee DE, Van Der Schouw YT. Dietary intake of total, animal, and vegetable protein and risk of type 2 diabetes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-NL study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Tian S, Xu Q, Jiang R, Han T, Sun C, Na L. Dietary protein consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Nutrients 2017;9:1-17.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
He JR, Yuan MY, Chen NN, Lu JH, Hu CY, Mai WB, et al. Maternal dietary patterns and gestational diabetes mellitus: A large prospective cohort study in China. Br J Nutr 2015;113:1292-300.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Karamanos B, Thanopoulou A, Anastasiou E, Assaad-Khalil S, Albache N, Bachaoui M, et al. Relation of the Mediterranean diet with the incidence of gestational diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:8-13.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Radesky JS, Oken E, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. Diet during early pregnancy and development of gestational diabetes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008;22:47-59.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bao W, Bowers K, Tobias DK, Hu FB, Zhang C. Prepregnancy dietary protein intake, major dietary protein sources, and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2001-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Zhang C, Schulze MB, Solomon CG, Hu FB. A prospective study of dietary patterns, meat intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2006;49:2604-13.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Pang WW, Colega M, Cai S, Chan YH, Padmapriya N, Chen LW, et al. Higher maternal dietary protein intake is associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in a multiethnic Asian cohort. J Nutr 2017;147:653-60.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zhang C, Schulze MB, Solomon CG, Hu FB. A prospective study of dietary patterns, meat intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2006;49:2604-13.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Moghaddam MHB, Aghdam FB, Jafarabadi MA, Allahverdipour H, Nikookheslat SD, Safarpour S. The Iranian version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Iran: Content and construct validity, factor structure, internal consistency and stability. World Appl Sci J 2012;18:1073-80.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Asghari G, Rezazadeh A, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Br J Nutr 2012;108:1109-17.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Torvik K, Narverud I, Ottestad I, Svilaas A, Gran JM, Retterstøl K, et al. Dietary counseling is associated with an improved lipid profile in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 2016;252:21-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Koebnick C, Sinha R. Trends in meat consumption in the USA. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:575-83.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kurotani K, Nanri A, Goto A, Mizoue T, Noda M, Oba S, et al. Red meat consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in men but not in women: A Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Br J Nutr 2013;110:1910-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rajpathak SN, Crandall JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Kabat GC, Rohan TE, Hu FB. The role of iron in type 2 diabetes in humans. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1790:671-81.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Karimi M, Kadivar R, Yarmohammadi H. Assessment of the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia, by serum ferritin, in pregnant women of Southern Iran. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:CR488-92.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ericson U, Sonestedt E, Gullberg B, Hellstrand S, Hindy G, Wirfält E, et al. High intakes of protein and processed meat associate with increased incidence of type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr 2013;109:1143-53.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Schulze MB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Processed meat intake and incidence of Type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Diabetologia 2003;46:1465-73.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Steinbrecher A, Erber E, Grandinetti A, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: The Multiethnic Cohort. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:568-74.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Lichtenstein AH, Schwab US. Relationship of dietary fat to glucose metabolism. Atherosclerosis 2000;150:227-43.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Villegas R, Xiang YB, Elasy T, Li HL, Yang G, Cai H, et al. Fish, shellfish, and long-chain n-3 fatty acid consumption and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Chinese men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:543-51.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Patel PS, Sharp SJ, Luben RN, Khaw KT, Bingham SA, Wareham NJ, et al. Association between type of dietary fish and seafood intake and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort study. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1857-63.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wallin A, Di Giuseppe D, Orsini N, Patel PS, Forouhi NG, Wolk A. Fish consumption, dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids, and risk of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care 2012;35:918-29.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
D'Andrea G. Quercetin: A flavonol with multifaceted therapeutic applications? Fitoterapia 2015;106:256-71.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Boucher BJ, Mannan N. Eating fish and risk of type 2 diabetes: A population-based, prospective follow-up study: Comment on van Woudenbergh et al. Diabetes Care 2010;33.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Halton TL, Liu S, Manson JE, Hu FB. Low-carbohydrate-diet score and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:339-46.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Villegas R, Gao YT, Yang G, Li HL, Elasy TA, Zheng W, et al. Legume and soy food intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Shanghai women's health study. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:162-7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Gannon MC, Nuttall JA, Nuttall FQ. Oral arginine does not stimulate an increase in insulin concentration but delays glucose disposal. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:1016-22.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Jiang R, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Liu S, Willett WC, Hu FB. Nut and peanut butter consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:2554-60.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Iwase M, Nunoi K, Wakisaka M, Wada M, Kodama T, Maki Y, et al. Effects of salt loading on glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and albuminuria in rats with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 1992;41:966-9.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Tong X, Dong JY, Wu ZW, Li W, Qin LQ. Dairy consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:1027-31.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Jeong SM, Kang MJ, Choi HN, Kim JH, Kim JI. Quercetin ameliorates hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia and improves antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Nutr Res Pract 2012;6:201-7.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
O'brien T, Nguyen TT, Buithieu J, Kottke BA. Lipoprotein compositional changes in the fasting and postprandial state on a high-carbohydrate low-fat and a high-fat diet in subjects with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:1345-51.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Kumar M, Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Kumar V, Lahkar M. Molecular and biochemical evidence on the protective effects of quercetin in isoproterenol-induced acute myocardial injury in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2017;31:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Guo J, Hobbs DA, Cockcroft JR, Elwood PC, Pickering JE, Lovegrove JA, et al. Association between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease events, diabetes and all-cause mortality. Eur J Nutr 2017:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Tamez M, Virtanen JK, Lajous M. Egg consumption and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Nutr 2016;115:2212-8.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Fuller NR, Sainsbury A, Caterson ID, Markovi TP. Egg consumption and human cardio-metabolic health in people with and without diabetes. Nutrients 2015;7:7399-420.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Pearce KL, Clifton PM, Noakes M. Egg consumption as part of an energy-restricted high-protein diet improves blood lipid and blood glucose profiles in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr 2011;105:584-92.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Blesso CN, Andersen CJ, Barona J, Volek JS, Fernandez ML. Whole egg consumption improves lipoprotein profiles and insulin sensitivity to a greater extent than yolk-free egg substitute in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Metabolism 2013;62:400-10.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Nicolau M, Dovichi SS, Cuttle G. Pro-inflammatory effect of quercetin by dual blockade of angiotensin converting-enzyme and neutral endopeptidase in vivo. Nutr Neurosci 2003;6:309-16.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Schoenaker DAJM, Mishra GD, Callaway LK, Soedamah-Muthu SS. The role of energy, nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of observational studies. Diabetes Care 2016;39:16-23.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Qiu C, Frederick IO, Zhang C, Sorensen TK, Enquobahrie DA, Williams MA. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to maternal egg and cholesterol intake. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:649-58.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
van Nielen M, Feskens EJ, Mensink M, Sluijs I, Molina E, Amiano P, et al. Dietary protein intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in Europe: The EPIC-InterAct Case-Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1854-62.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Buchanan TA, Xiang AH. Gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Investig 2005;115:485-91.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Goodarzi-Khoigani M, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad SS, Baghiani Moghadam MH, Nadjarzadeh A, Mardanian F, Fallahzadeh H, et al. Prevention of insulin resistance by dietary intervention among pregnant mothers: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Prev Med 2017;8:85.  Back to cited text no. 56
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed213    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded52    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]