|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 132
Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on confocal microscopic findings and tear indices in patients with progressive keratoconus
Mohammad Ali Zare1, Mehdi Mazloumi1, Hasan Farajipour2, Bagher Hoseini3, Mohammad R Fallah1, Hadi Z Mahrjerdi1, Mohammad-Ali Abtahi4, Seyed-Hossein Abtahi4
1 Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran; Department of Ophthalmology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3 Iran Eye Bank, Tehran, Iran
4 Isfahan Eye Research Center, Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
|Date of Submission||29-Jun-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||29-Oct-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Dec-2016|
Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: To evaluate any change in tear indices and confocal microscopic findings after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.
Methods: Thirty-two consecutive eyes from 23 patients having progressive keratoconus were enrolled in this prospective, interventional cohort study. The standard crosslinking surgery was performed for all patients. Visual, refractive, and topographic evaluations were done before and at 6 months after surgery. Tear function tests and confocal microscopic examination were performed before and at 1 month and 6 months after the procedure.
Results: There was no significant change in Schirmer-1 test results and tear osmolarity at 1 month and 6 months after CXL. Using confocal microscopy, all eyes showed reduced or absent subepithelial nerve plexus. Differences in basal epithelial cell density, epithelial mean cell area, and keratocyte density in anterior and middle stroma and endothelial cell pleomorphism were all significant at 1 month and 6 months after CXL (P < 0.05). No significant change was noted in endothelial cell count and their polymegathism at 6 months follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, flattest corneal meridian (K2 ), and maximum keratometry in Pentacam (Kmax ) after 6 months of the procedure.
Conclusions : While CXL would have no effect on tear indices and endothelial cell count, it can cause a significant reduction in subepithelial nerve plexus and significant alterations in epithelial cell density in the anterior and middle stroma.
Keywords: Confocal microscopy, corneal collagen crosslinking, keratoconus
|How to cite this article:|
Zare MA, Mazloumi M, Farajipour H, Hoseini B, Fallah MR, Mahrjerdi HZ, Abtahi MA, Abtahi SH. Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on confocal microscopic findings and tear indices in patients with progressive keratoconus. Int J Prev Med 2016;7:132
|How to cite this URL:|
Zare MA, Mazloumi M, Farajipour H, Hoseini B, Fallah MR, Mahrjerdi HZ, Abtahi MA, Abtahi SH. Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on confocal microscopic findings and tear indices in patients with progressive keratoconus. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Sep 28];7:132. Available from: https://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2016/7/1/132/196527
| Introduction|| |
Keratoconus is an ectasia of the cornea causing progressive thinning, bulging, and distortion.  The disease causes biomechanical weakening of the cornea by alterations in collagen arrangement and changes of extracellular matrix, and keratocyte apoptosis that take place through the stroma and Bowman's layer.  Excessive levels of proteolytic enzymes along lack of protease inhibitors are known to occur during the disease course and decrease the stromal thickness and modify its collagen configuration. 
Keratoplasty has long been a traditional recourse for advanced keratoconus, and the disease has been the main indication of corneal graft surgery. Riboflavin corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) by ultraviolet A (UVA) has been the only option that aimed to improve corneal biomechanics and stop the ectatic progression through stiffening the anterior corneal stroma. , CXL can help maintain the current visual status; it is meant to prevent vision from worsening. Of note, previous studies investigating the role of CXL in the management of progressive keratoconus have also shown an improvement in visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes, as well as optical higher order aberrations.  Few confocal microscopic studies are available investigating the effect of CXL on modifications in corneal layers such as apoptosis of keratocytes in the anterior and intermediate stroma and keratocytes repopulation. ,,, In the present study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate all confocal microscopic measures in progressive keratoconic patients. In addition, for the first time in Iran, we tried to assess the effect of CXL on tear indices in such cases.
| Methods|| |
Design and ethics
From December 2012 to August 2013, 32 eyes from 23 Iranian patients who met the inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled in this prospective, interventional cohort study. The protocol was primarily reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and all patients gave signed informed consent before inclusion.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) age ≥13 years; (ii) progressive keratoconus defined as the presence of at least one of the following changes over a year: complain of decreased visual acuity except what originated from noncorneal conditions, an increase of ≥1.00 diopter (D) in the steepest K/manifest cylinder, and an increase of ≥0.50 D in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent; (iii) thickness of the cornea ≥400 μm; and (iv) maximum keratometry (Kmax ) <60 D as measured by Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: other corneal diseases (e.g., herpetic keratitis and corneal opacities), other ophthalmic problems (e.g., ocular autoimmune disease and previous ocular surgery), and problematic conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, and breastfeeding period).
Examinations and pre-/post-operative care
All patients in the study underwent full ophthalmic examination including assessment of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart, slit-lamp microscopic examination, Schirmer-1 test without anesthetic drop, break-up time (BUT) test, rotating Scheimpflug topography (Pentacam HR, Oculus 70900, Germany), tear osmolarity (TO) (TearLab Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA), and confocal microscopy (Confoscan 3; NIDEK Technology, Padova, Italy).
Study visits were undertaken at baseline (visit 1; preoperative), day 3-5 (visit 2; complete re-epithelialization), and months 1 and 6 (visits 3 and 4), postoperatively.
In cases with rigid contact lens use, patients were instructed not to use them for at least 2 weeks before inclusion in the study and each follow-up examination and also, for 1 month postoperatively.
CXL was conducted under sterile conditions in the operating room according to methods described elsewhere in detail.  After instilling topical anesthesia (tetracaine 0.5%, SinaDarou, Iran), the central 9 mm of the corneal epithelium were removed by mechanical debridement. The riboflavin solution (0.1% in 20% dextran T500 solution; SinaDarou, Iran) was then administered topically every 3 min for 30 min. Following riboflavin administration, its thorough absorption in the stroma and anterior chamber was confirmed by slit-lamp examination. UVA 365 nm light (UV-X system, IROC AG, Zurich, Switzerland) was used for 30 min at an irradiance of 3.0 mW/cm². UVA exposure was with the continuance of riboflavin instillation every 3 min. After treatment, patients were medicated with topical antibiotic for 2 weeks and corticosteroid for 4 weeks. Soft therapeutic lens (PureVision, Bausch & Lomb Inc., Rochester, NY) were applied until complete re-epithelialization (typically 3-5 days, postoperatively).
Confocal scan methodology
After anesthetizing the eye with topical anesthetic eye drop (tetracaine 0.5%) and applying an immersion gel (Viscotears, Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland) onto the tip of the front lens (Achroplan 40×/0.75 W ∞/0), confocal scanning was done using ConfoScan 3 (Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy). Manual scan mode was used to capture the images of different corneal layers. Endothelial cell count was done by automatic mode using NAVIS software (Nidek, Padua, Italy) and followed by manual editing of automatically recognized cells. The density of stromal keratocytes at different layers and basal epithelial cells were measured by manual mode. An equal "region of interest" was selected for all patients. Stromal images just anterior to endothelium were used to measure keratocyte density of "posterior stroma" (PSKD), and those stromal images just posterior to basal epithelium were considered as "anterior stroma" (ASKD). The middle stromal nerves as a marker were used in combination with the Z-scan curve to detect the level of middle stroma.
Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 18 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Variables are expressed as a mean ± standard deviation. A P ≤ 0.05 was taken as the significance threshold. Based on the number of cases (>30 cases) and normality analysis based on Shapiro-Wilk (P = 0.73), comparative analysis (baseline, 1 and 6 months) was performed using repeated measures ANOVA.
| Results|| |
Thirty-two eyes (16 right eyes and 16 left eyes) of 23 patients (18 men and 5 women) were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 21.57 ± 6.23 years (range: 14-30 years).
[Table 1] summarizes the visual, refractive, topographic, and pachymetric results of the patients before CXL and at 6 months after the procedure.
|Table 1: Visual, refractive, topographic, and pachymetric measures before and 6 months after corneal collagen crosslinking |
Click here to view
The mean Tear BUT before CXL and at 1 month and 6 months after the procedure were 14.06 ± 2.22 s, 13.19 ± 1.67 s, and 13.2 ± 1.48 s, respectively. The change in BUT was significant 1 month after CXL (P < 0.05), but it was not significant after 6 months of CXL. The mean Schirmer's test result before CXL and after 1 month and 6 months of CXL were 15.69 ± 4.06 mm, 15.41 ± 3.74 mm, and 14.91 ± 2.49 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between pre- and post-CXL values (P > 0.1). Mean TO before CXL and at 1 month and 6 months of procedure were 300.7 ± 16.5 mOsm/L, 300.3 ± 12.9 mOsm/L, and 302.09 ± 10.8 mOsm/L, respectively. The differences between baseline and postoperative values were not significant (P > 0.05) [Table 2].
|Table 2: Tear indices of the patients at three-time points: Before corneal collagen crosslinking, 1 month after corneal collagen crosslinking and 6 months after corneal collagen crosslinking |
Click here to view
Confocal microscopic indices
Mean corneal basal epithelial cell density before CXL and after 1 month and 6 months of CXL were 6006.3 ± 413.8 cell/mm², 5460.5 ± 703.6 cell/mm², and 5295.3 ± 690.1 cell/mm², respectively. The difference between preoperative and postoperative values was significant (P < 0.05), but no significant change was noted between 1 month and 6 months after the procedure (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean corneal epithelial cell area before CXL and after 1 and 6 months were 171.5 ± 15.2 μm², 185.4 ± 27.8 μm², and 192.2 ± 25.8 μm², respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was significant (P < 0.05), but no change was observed between 1 and 6 months (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean ASKD before CXL and after 1 and 6 months were 880.8 ± 85.4 cell/mm², 6.53 ± 22.1 cell/mm², and 45.5 ± 14.35 cell/mm², respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was significant (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was noted between 1 and 6 months (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean keratocyte density in the corneal middle stroma (MSKD) before CXL and after 1 and 6 months were 644.6 ± 118.8 cell/mm², 139.4 ± 127.2 cell/mm², and 139.1 ± 96.5 cell/mm², respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was significant (P < 0.05), but no significant change was detected between 1 and 6 months (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean PSKD before CXL and after 1 month and 6 months of procedure were 602.13 ± 97.8 cell/mm², 709.3 ± 203.9 cell/mm², and 659.6 ± 220.2 cell/mm, respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was not significant (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean corneal endothelial cell density before CXL and after 1 and 6 months of procedure were 3005.8 ± 304.4 cell/mm², 2922.3 ± 316.4 cell/mm², and 2911.3 ± 279.4 cell/mm², respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was not significant (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean corneal endothelial polymegathism before CXL and after 1 and 6 months of procedure were 27.3 ± 3.3, 27.06 ± 3.6, and 27.2 ± 4.7, respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was not significant (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Mean corneal endothelial pleomorphism before CXL and after 1 and 6 months of procedure were 31.5 ± 8.5, 36.5 ± 9.7, and 37.8 ± 8.7, respectively. The difference between baseline and postoperative values was significant (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was noted between 1 and 6 months after CXL (P > 0.05) [Table 3].
|Table 3: Confocal microscopic findings at three-time points: Before corneal collagen crosslinking, after 1 month, and after 6 months of corneal collagen crosslinking |
Click here to view
After 1 month of follow-up, subepithelial nerve plexus was absent in 25 eyes (78.12%) and was reduced in 7 eyes (21.87%). At 6 months follow-up time, the plexus was absent in 22 eyes (68.75%) and was reduced in 10 eyes (31.25%). All these eyes showed complete resolution of inflammation after 6 months of procedure.
No significant correlation was noted between tear indices and confocal microscopic findings except between decreased or absent subepithelial nerve plexus and increased TO at 1 month of follow-up time (r = 0.63, P < 0.05). No ocular or systemic adverse event was observed, and no significant intraocular pressure change was seen during 6 months of follow-up.
| Discussion|| |
CXL technique is indeed photopolymerization of stromal collagen fibers by the combination of a photosensitizing substance and UVA. The procedure is planned to stiffen the cornea by increasing the number of intrafibrillar and interfibrillar covalent bonds and corneal collagen resistance against enzymatic degradation.  One of the earliest long-term studies in 2004 revealed that CXL can delay keratoconus progression and decrease the demand for penetrating keratoplasty. , Moreover, CXL is reported to improve patients' visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes in some cases. , However, alterations in tear indices after any cornea procedure are important subjects of concern to the refractive surgeon. To better evaluate the correlation of these indices with corneal structural changes, we preferred to evaluate such indices with subepithelial nerve plexus morphology, simultaneously.
Tear evaluation tests in our study only showed a significant decrease in BUT for 1 month; however, BUT returned to near-normal values over the ensuing 6 months of follow-up. Other tear indices including Schirmer-1 test and TO did not show any significant difference after 1 and 6 months of follow-up. Such a finding may not be explainable by the absence of subepithelial nerve plexus that we found in about 78% and 68% over 1 and 6 months of follow-up, respectively. Such an absence and damage of nerve fibers through anterior stroma has also been reported in two previous works. , Moreover, one study found near-normal tear indices and amazingly significant central hypoesthesia after 9 months of CXL, like our experience. They attributed this finding to the intact sensitivity of the peripheral cornea. They concluded that these intact nerve fibers in the periphery may be sufficient to maintain the basic secretion. 
Overall, BUT of more than 10 s, Schirmer-1 test of more than 10 mm  and TO in the range of 303.52 ± 12.92 mOsm/L , is known to be normal, and mean of all of these parameters were within normal ranges in our patients before CXL and 1 and 6 months thereafter. Therefore, it seems that dry eye after CXL should not be a concern for the refractive surgeon.
In an in vivo confocal study on humans, Mazzotta et al. studied the early/late modification of corneal microstructure after CXL treatment. Disconnected nerves during the first 6 months and formation of interconnected fibers after 6 months implied a primary regeneration process. This process and the following interconnection of secondary nerves could partially restore corneal sensitivity and lacrimal reflex.  This study demonstrated the disappearance of subepithelial and stromal nerve fibers in the central irradiated area after treatment and gradual microscopic reinnervation at 6 months follow-up. Such a finding was in concordance with previous studies. ,,, Similar microstructural evaluation of nerve fibers by Mazzotta et al.  revealed that the regeneration process origins faster from the subepithelial nerve fibers and grows through the nonirradiated area as soon as 1 month postoperatively; whereas, the regeneration process of anterior stroma fibers toward the deep nerve plexus occurs not sooner than the second and third months. Our results indicate that this regeneration process gradually progresses; however, the structure of the nerve plexus will not be well defined even at 6 months, postoperatively.
In this study, in line with the Touboul et al. study,  we demonstrated that ASKD and MSKD, but not that in the posterior stroma, severely decreases after CXL and keratocyte repopulation does not complete after 6 months of the procedure. This decrease occurres more at the first month, with a relative recovery over the ensuing 6 months. We found no significant difference in corneal endothelial cell counts and their polymegathism at our 1 and 6 months follow-up times, a finding supported by previous studies. ,,, However, a significant increase in endothelial cell pleomorphism was seen after 1 month which persisted still significantly after 6 months. The lack of evidence for endothelial cell loss is an important safety consideration in assessing CXL.
In our study, CXL led to corneal flattening with a significant UCVA and BSCVA improvement of 0.28 logMAR and 0.30 logMAR, respectively; this was similar to some previous studies. ,, The reduction of K-readings in our study could explain the improvement in the postoperative visual acuity confirmed in the studies performed by Wollensak et al. and Koller et al. , In our study, mean improvements in the SE at 6 months were 0.28 D and 0.32 D with subjective and cyclorefraction, respectively. However, these changes were statistically insignificant; probably, due to poor reproducibility of subjective refraction in cases of irregular corneal topographies. Kmax , somewhat, evaluates the severity of the keratoconic cone; hence, this variable is indeed a key topographic indicator of CXL success. Although about 1 D reduction in the Kmax reading in our study may not be clinically enough for visual rehabilitation, such a continuous effect for several years may do so.  Hence, longer follow-up period is warranted to determine whether Kmax will continuously decrease in this setting. Previous studies have reported a decrease in Kmax of 2.01 D,  1.90 D,  1.46 D,  and 1.42 D  in keratoconic patients.
In the present study, we found a significant reduction in pachymetric thinnest point. However, this finding could negatively bias by epithelial thinning and keratocyte loss in the anterior-mid stroma.  Such a pseudo-reduction may be due to two main reasons: A measurement underestimation and changes in stromal reflectivity after CXL. The treated/untreated stroma demarcation line could have been misread as a pseudoposterior corneal surface. In this regard, ultrasound pachymetry, confocal microscopy, and Visante optical coherence tomography may be less biased by the stromal microstructural alterations following CXL.
The main limitation of our study was the relatively short duration of follow-up. However, our findings are promising and imply that it would be rewarding to further investigate the long-term outcome of this procedure in keratoconus.
| Conclusions|| |
While CXL would have no effect on tear indices and endothelial cell count, it can cause a significant reduction in subepithelial nerve plexus and significant alterations in epithelial cell density in the anterior and middle stroma.
Financial support and sponsorship
This project was funded by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Pouliquen Y. Doyne lecture keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 1987;1(Pt 1):1-14.
Radner W, Zehetmayer M, Skorpik C, Mallinger R. Altered organization of collagen in the apex of keratoconus corneas. Ophthalmic Res 1998;30:327-32.
Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res 1980;31:435-41.
Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, Hunter WS, Rootman DS. Three decades of corneal transplantation: Indications and patient characteristics. Cornea 2000;19:7-11.
Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, Unger G, Wittig C, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:279-83.
Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh MJ, Hersh PS. Higher-order aberrations after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:292-302.
Mazzotta C, Balestrazzi A, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T, Tommasi C, et al.
Treatment of progressive keratoconus by riboflavin-UVA-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: Ultrastructural analysis by heidelberg retinal tomograph II in vivo
confocal microscopy in humans. Cornea 2007;26:390-7.
Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Sergio P, Caporossi T, Caporossi A. Conservative treatment of keratoconus by riboflavin-uva-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: Qualitative investigation. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16:530-5.
Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, Praud D, Malet F, Colin J. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2012;28:769-76.
Knappe S, Stachs O, Zhivov A, Hovakimyan M, Guthoff R. Results of confocal microscopy examinations after collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UVA light in patients with progressive keratoconus. Ophthalmologica 2011;225:95-104.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620-7.
Sloot F, Soeters N, van der Valk R, Tahzib NG. Effective corneal collagen crosslinking in advanced cases of progressive keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:1141-5.
Caporossi A, Baiocchi S, Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caporossi T. Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin-ultraviolet type A rays induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: Preliminary refractive results in an Italian study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:837-45.
Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al.
Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 2009;116:369-78.
Spoerl E, Mrochen M, Sliney D, Trokel S, Seiler T. Safety of UVA-riboflavin cross-linking of the cornea. Cornea 2007;26:385-9.
Al-Aqaba M, Calienno R, Fares U, Otri AM, Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, et al.
The effect of standard and transepithelial ultraviolet collagen cross-linking on human corneal nerves: An ex vivo
study. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:258-66.e2.
Ishikawa T, del Cerro M, Liang FQ, Loya N, Aquavella JV. Corneal sensitivity and nerve regeneration after excimer laser ablation. Cornea 1994;13:225-31.
Kontadakis GA, Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, Pallikaris AI. Effect of corneal collagen cross-linking on corneal innervation, corneal sensitivity, and tear function of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2013;120:917-22.
van Bijsterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in the Sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:10-4.
Szalai E, Berta A, Szekanecz Z, Szûcs G, Módis L Jr. Evaluation of tear osmolarity in non-Sjögren and Sjögren syndrome dry eye patients with the TearLab system. Cornea 2012;31:867-71.
Jacobi C, Jacobi A, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C. Tear film osmolarity measurements in dry eye disease using electrical impedance technology. Cornea 2011;30:1289-92.
Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi O, Bovone C, Sparano MC, et al.
Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo
: Early and late modifications. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:527-33.
Wasilewski D, Mello GH, Moreira H. Impact of collagen crosslinking on corneal sensitivity in keratoconus patients. Cornea 2013;32:899-902.
Koller T, Pajic B, Vinciguerra P, Seiler T. Flattening of the cornea after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1488-92.
Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: Long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:796-801.
Grewal DS, Brar GS, Jain R, Sood V, Singla M, Grewal SP. Corneal collagen crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light for keratoconus: One-year analysis using Scheimpflug imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:425-32.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Dexpanthenol/sodium hyaluronate eye drops for corneal epithelial healing following corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus
| ||Huri Sabur, Mutlu Acar |
| ||International Ophthalmology. 2023; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Evaluation of tear parameters and meibomian gland morphology in keratoconus patients after epithelial-on corneal cross-linking
| ||Hasan Akgöz, Hüseyin Findik, Mehmet Gökhan Aslan |
| ||European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022; : 1120672122 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Evaluation in Patients with Keratoconus
| ||Alvin Wei Jun Teo, Hassan Mansoor, Nigel Sim, Molly Tzu-Yu Lin, Yu-Chi Liu |
| ||Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(2): 393 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Under General Anesthesia for Pediatric Patients With Keratoconus and Developmental Delay
| ||Tessnim R. Ahmad,Neel D. Pasricha,Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer,Julius T. Oatts,Julie M. Schallhorn,Maanasa Indaram |
| ||Cornea. 2020; 39(5): 546 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Early evaluation of corneal collagen crosslinking in ex-vivo human corneas using two-photon imaging
| ||Ana Batista,Hans Georg Breunig,Tobias Hager,Berthold Seitz,Karsten König |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Novel Biomedical Applications of Crosslinked Collagen
| ||Lisha Gu,Tiantian Shan,Yu-xuan Ma,Franklin R. Tay,Lina Niu |
| ||Trends in Biotechnology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The 7-Year Outcomes of Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-linking in Progressive Keratoconus
| ||Mohamed Shafik Shaheen,Mohamed M. Lolah,David P. Piñero |
| ||Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2018; 34(3): 181 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|