|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 76
Cancer events after acute or chronic exposure to sulfur mustard: A review of the literature
Seyed Mansour Razavi1, Mohammad Abdollahi2, Payman Salamati3
1 Department of Community Medicine, Research Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Community Medicine, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Submission||05-Aug-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||14-Mar-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||19-May-2016|
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Square, Imam Khomeini Avenue, Tehran
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Sulfur mustard (SM) has been considered as a carcinogen in the laboratory studies. However, its carcinogenic effects on human beings were not well discussed. The main purpose of our study is to assess carcinogenesis of SM following acute and/or chronic exposures in human beings.
Methods: The valid scientific English and Persian databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IranMedex, and Irandoc were searched and the collected papers reviewed. The used keywords were in two languages: English and Persian. The inclusion criteria were the published original articles indexed in above-mentioned databases. Eleven full-texts out of 296 articles were found relevant and then assessed.
Results: Studies on the workers of the SM factories during the World Wars showed that the long-term chronic exposure to mustards can cause a variety of cancers in the organs such as oral cavity, larynx, lung, and skin. Respiratory system was the most important affected system. Acute single exposure to SM was assumed as the carcinogenic inducer in the lung and blood and for few cancers including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Conclusions: SM is a proven carcinogen in chronic situations although data are not enough to strongly conclude in acute exposure.
Keywords: Cancer, chemical warfare, Iraq-Iran war, mustard gas, sulfur mustard
|How to cite this article:|
Razavi SM, Abdollahi M, Salamati P. Cancer events after acute or chronic exposure to sulfur mustard: A review of the literature. Int J Prev Med 2016;7:76
|How to cite this URL:|
Razavi SM, Abdollahi M, Salamati P. Cancer events after acute or chronic exposure to sulfur mustard: A review of the literature. Int J Prev Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 4];7:76. Available from: https://www.ijpvmjournal.net/text.asp?2016/7/1/76/182733
| Introduction|| |
During the Iraq-Iran war (1980-1988), the Iranian troops and some ordinary people were attacked 387 times,  by more than 1800 tons of sulfur mustard (SM) gas by the Iraqi armies. Consequently, over 100,000 military or civilian people were exposed to SM,  and thus a considerable proportion of exposed people are still suffering from the long-term consequences of exposure such as respiratory, ocular, and dermatology problems. ,,, As well, SM was used as a chemical weapon by the Iraqi armies against indigenous Iraqi Kurds. ,,
The carcinogenic effect of SM has already been evaluated in laboratory and human being studies. , SM is a nucleophilic and lipophilic agent and due to this property, it can diffuse through the body and can change DNA structure. These DNA changes are involved in producing acute toxicity as well as long-term carcinogenicity of SM. 
Alkylation reaction disrupts DNA replication and protein synthesis by replacing hydrogen by an alkyl group which is the equivalent of an alkyl anion (carbanion). , The changes created by SM in the DNA base explain the mutagenic and carcinogenic of SM. 
According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer report in 1975, SM is a well-known carcinogen in animals and human. 
Although SM has been considered as a carcinogen in the laboratory studies, its carcinogenic effects, particularly on acute situations, have not been well discussed yet. The aim of this study was to review the published articles discussing on human cancers in relation to SM acute and/or chronic exposures.
| Methods|| |
During a systematic search, we used PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Iranmedex, and Irandoc to evaluate the international and national medical databases. Two hundred and ninety-six records were extracted, and their contents were subsequently reviewed. The used keywords were in English and Persian languages. The inclusion criteria were published the original articles in valued journals indexed in the above-mentioned databases. The exclusion criteria were animal studies. All of the original papers which studied acute or chronic carcinogenic consequences of SM were included. There was no time interval limitation for searching databases. Most of the studies had focused on respiratory, dermatological, and ophthalmological complications. After title and abstract screening, 11 articles were found relevant to the aim of this study and their full-texts were subsequently evaluated. The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Ethics Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
| Results|| |
The studies which considered the associations between various cancers and occupational chronic exposure of mustard gas are summarized in [Table 1].
|Table 1: The results of some studies evaluated the carcinogenicity of sulfur mustard in occupational condition among sulfur mustard factory workers|
Click here to view
There was an increased mortality resulted from oral cavity cancers in the workers who had chronic exposure to mustard gas. Easton et al., in a cohort study, conducted on 2498 men and 1032 women, found a strong relationship between exposure to SM and cancers of the lip, tongue, salivary glands, and mouth.  The association between laryngeal and tracheal cancers was reported by Manning et al. among SM factory workers (1939-1945). 
Doi et al. compared 480 exposed with 969 unexposed workers in an SM factory in Japan from 1929 to 1945. They concluded that the workers were at risk of developing lung cancer.  As well, mortality of lung cancer in exposed workers significantly increased in comparison to unexposed ones.  Moreover, Easton et al. in their study found a strong relationship between SM exposure and lung cancer. 
Bowen's carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma in situ) was reported due to occupational exposure to mustard gas by Inada et al. 
The studies which evaluated the relationship between acute SM exposure and various cancers are summarized in [Table 2].
|Table 2: The results of some studies evaluated the carcinogenicity of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans after Iraq‑Iran war|
Click here to view
Zafarghandi et al. conducted a cohort study and compared the incidence rates of malignancies in 7570 veterans who exposed to SM and 7595 unexposed people in a 25-year follow-up period.  Although they found an increased age-specific incidence rate of cancer in the exposed rather than unexposed population, no evidence of increased age-adjusted incidence rate of specific cancer types was found.
Hosseini-khalili et al. conducted a molecular study on 20 Iranian male patients with lung cancer who had a history of single high-dose exposure to SM during Iraq-Iran war.  Considering DNA sequence analysis, some of the patients showed mutations related to SM.
Their study showed that single high-dose exposure to this agent could relate to lung cancer. 
Zakeri Nia et al. studied 3000 veterans from the Fars Province in Iran more than 15 years post their exposure to mustard gas. They evaluated relative risks (RRs) of aplastic anemia and hematologic malignancies and reported that exposure to mustard gas caused aplastic anemia (RR = 19) and blood malignancies including acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (RR = 8), acute lymphocytic leukemia (RR = 11), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (RR = 8), hairy cell leukemia (RR = 11), Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 5), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 2), and intestinal Mediterranean lymphoma (RR = 13). 
Ghanei and Vosoghi evaluated the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) activity of 665 chemically injured veterans and performed further cytochemical studies on the positive cases. Among the victims, nine cases had a decreased LAP, and two of them suffered from a CML. They reported a higher incidence of CML among the veterans exposed to mustard gas rather than normal population. 
Davoudi et al. evaluated 9,605 chemically injured veterans 10-15 years after their exposure to SM from 17 provinces of Iran in 2006. Although they found four cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) among the victims, there was no statistically significant difference between the patients and the general population.  In another study, Mortazavi et al. assessed 800 chemically injured veterans 14-30 years after exposure in 2005. They found only one case of BCC and one case of squamous cell carcinoma among the veterans. 
| Discussion|| |
SM can increase the cytotoxic T-cells and reduce natural killer cells (NKCs).  NKCs are lymphocytes which can kill tumor cells. Animal studies have shown a critical role for NKCs in controlling tumor growth and metastasis providing new insights into the treatment of human cancers. , Shaker et al. showed that the immune system of the chemically injured people was still impaired 10 years after exposure to SM. 
Regarding the reviewed studies and existing evidence, the relationship between chronic exposure to SM and incidence of various cancers cannot be ignored.  Ghanei and Harandi have confirmed this idea for lung cancers and mentioned that SM is an alkylating agent with potentially carcinogenic property in the respiratory tract.  Once SM microparticles reach to small bronchioles, their effects start happening.  Gene mutation is one of the late effects of SM causing pulmonary cancer.  Balali-Mood and Hefazi also mentioned bronchogenic carcinoma as a late complication of SM.  Likewise, they reported BCC, Bowen's carcinoma, and spinocellular skin cancer due to chronic exposure to mustard gas. 
We believe that when we are going to justify the relationship between acute exposure to SM and various cancers, one should be more cautious. Indeed, only a few original studies found such a relationship. For instance, although Zafarghandi et al. found the increased age-specific incidence rates of cancer, their results showed no evidence of increased age-adjusted incidence rate for specific cancer types.  Similarly, Hosseini-khalili et al. conducted a molecular study on only 20 veterans.  Moreover, Ghanei and Vosoghi found only 2 CML cases among 665 patients. They also mentioned that their results should be cautiously interpreted due to some confounding factors within their study.  Accordingly, Davoudi et al. did not find any statistically significant difference between 9605 chemically injured veterans and general population according to BCC prevalence.  Furthermore, Mortazavi et al. found only one case of SCC and one case of BCC among 800 veterans. 
One follow-up study conducted in 1955 on soldiers who were exposed to SM during the World War I showed that mustard gas had no effect on the development of lung cancer.  Hadi et al. conducted a case-control study of 321 children younger than 15 years. They were 107 AML and all cases and 214 controls. They compared some variables between the two groups such as the history of attending in chemical war by the patients' fathers. Seven patients in the case group and three patients in the control group had such a history. They showed a significant odds ratio (4.9) of acute leukemia among the cases compared to the controls. 
Furthermore, Nik Siyar et al. compared 237 chemically injured and 202 healthy individuals showed that two hematologic indicators, hypogranulated neutrophils (the G-score) and percentage of polaroid cells, were significantly more among exposed people to SM than healthy individuals.  They suggested that the exposed people should be followed up for myelodysplastic syndromes in future.
Likewise, Maleki et al. reported a case of merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in the place of mustard scar, 21 years after the exposure. MCC is an invasive primary neuroendocrine and nonmelanoma skin carcinoma. 
Considering our results although mustard gas is a proven carcinogenic agent in chronic situations, there are conflicting views in relation to the carcinogenicity of acute exposure to this substance. ,
This review pulls together a broad array of data in an attempt to address whether acute SM exposure enhances long-term cancer risk among the survivors or not. However, confirming this idea is very difficult because cancer takes years/decades to develop, complicating the ability to directly link cancer onset with SM exposure. In addition, to prove any causal inference, we need vigorous evidence based on principles such as Bradford Hill's criteria.  At present, there is no sufficient evidence to substantiate such a relationship to underlying an increased cancer risk among SM survivors with a history of acute exposure to SM.
| Conclusions|| |
The relationship between chronic exposures to mustard gas and some types of cancers are well- documented so far. The respiratory system is more susceptible organ to cancer rather than others. The cancers occur through long-term and continuous exposure rather than an acute single-dose exposure.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Razavi SM, Salamati P, Saghafinia M, Abdollahi M. A review on delayed toxic effects of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans. DARU J Pharm Sci 2012;20:51.
Salamati P, Razavi SM, Shokraneh F, Mohazzab Torabi S, Laal M, Hadjati G, et al.
Mortality and injuries among Iranians in Iraq-Iran war: A systematic review. Arch Iran Med 2013;16:542-50.
Razavi SM, Salamati P, Harandi AA, Ghanei M. Prevention and treatment of respiratory consequences induced by sulfur mustard in Iranian casualties. Int J Prev Med 2013;4:383-9.
Razavi SM, Salamati P, Feizi S, Javadi MA. Mustard gas-induced ocular injuries: A review of manifestations and managements. Iran J Ophthalmol 2012;24:11-8.
Razavi SM, Davoudi SM, Saghafinia M, Salamati P. Effects of sulfur mustard on the skin and their management: Reviewing the studies conducted on Iranian chemical victims. Iran J Dermatol 2013;16:21-30.
Razavi SM, Karbakhsh M, Salamati P. Preventive measures against the mustard gas: A review. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2013;27:83-90.
Hosseini-khalili A, Haines DD, Modirian E, Soroush M, Khateri S, Joshi R, et al.
Mustard gas exposure and carcinogenesis of lung. Mutat Res 2009;678:1-6.
Razavi SM, Negahban Z, Pirhosseinloo M, Razavi MS, Hadjati G, Salamati P. Sulfur mustard effects on mental health and quality-of-life: A review. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2014;8:11-21.
Razavi SM, Razavi MS, Pirhosseinloo M, Salamati P. Iraq-Iran chemical war: calendar, mortality and morbidity. Chin J Traumatol 2014;17:165-9.
Zafarghandi MR, Soroush MR, Mahmoodi M, Naieni KH, Ardalan A, Dolatyari A, et al.
Incidence of cancer in Iranian sulfur mustard exposed veterans: A long-term follow-up cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:99-105.
Balali-Mood M, Hefazi M. The pharmacology, toxicology, and medical treatment of sulphur mustard poisoning. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2005;19:297-315.
Batal M, Boudry I, Mouret S, Cléry-Barraud C, Wartelle J, Bérard I, et al.
DNA damage in internal organs after cutaneous exposure to sulphur mustard. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014;278:39-44.
Cho CH, Li ZJ. Homing peptide for tumor vasculature. US Patent 8,247,378. Google Patents; 2012. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 27].
Hooshiar E, Mohammad Hassan Z, Salek Moghadam A, Shaker Z, Ebtekar M. Study of the effects of chemical warfare (mostly sulfur mustard) on neutrophils in chemical injuries ten years after exposed war. Iran Univ Med Sci J 2004;11:165-72.
Doi M, Hattori N, Yokoyama A, Onari Y, Kanehara M, Masuda K, et al.
Effect of mustard gas exposure on incidence of lung cancer: A longitudinal study. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:659-66.
Wada S, Miyanishi M, Nishimoto Y, Kambe S, Miller RW. Mustard gas as a cause of respiratory neoplasia in man. Lancet 1968;1:1161-3.
Easton DF, Peto J, Doll R. Cancers of the respiratory tract in mustard gas workers. Br J Ind Med 1988;45:652-9.
Manning KP, Skegg DC, Stell PM, Doll R. Cancer of the larynx and other occupational hazards of mustard gas workers. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1981;6:165-70.
Inada S, Hiragun K, Seo K, Yamura T. Multiple Bowen′s disease observed in former workers of a poison gas factory in Japan, with special reference to mustard gas exposure. J Dermatol 1978;5:49-60.
Zakeri Nia M, Namdar M, Alavi S, Abedi AR. Development of hematologic malignancies and aplastic anemia following exposure to mustard gas. J Mil Med 2002;4:157-61.
Ghanei M, Vosoghi AA. An epidemiologic study to screen for chronic myelocytic leukemia in war victims exposed to mustard gas. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:519-21.
Davoudi SM, Shohrati M, Sadr SB. Prevalence of skin tumors in veterans from 17 screened provinces of Iran and compared with the normal population. Ann Mil Health Sci Res 2006;4:751-4.
Mortazavi H, Raziei M, Emadi SN, Nakhaei MJ, Soroush MR, Mohammadpour PN, et al
. Skin complications in 800 chemical warfare victims, 14 to 20 years after exposure to mustard gas in Iran. J Dermatol 2005;8:177-89.
Razavi SM, Hadjati J, Salamati P. Effects of mustard gas on immune system of exposed Iranian people: A review of conducted studies. J Paramed Sci 2013;4:139-47.
Shaker Z, Hassan ZM, Sohrabpoor H, Mosaffa N. The immunostatus of T helper and T cytotoxic cells in the patients ten years after exposure to sulfur mustard. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2003;25:423-30.
Wu J, Lanier LL. Natural killer cells and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 2003;90:127-56.
Dacre JC, Goldman M. Toxicology and pharmacology of the chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard. Pharmacol Rev 1996;48:289-326.
Ghanei M, Harandi AA. Lung carcinogenicity of sulfur mustard. Clin Lung Cancer 2010;11:13-7.
Razavi SM, Ghanei M, Salamati P, Safiabadi M. Long-term effects of mustard gas on respiratory system of Iranian veterans after Iraq-Iran war: A review. Chin J Traumatol 2013;16:163-8.
Hadi N, Moezzi M, Etehadieh H. Risk factors for acute leukemia in children under 15 years in Shiraz/Iran. Daneshvar Univ Shahed 2006;14:57-65.
Nik Siyar M, Pour Fathollah AA, Nadali F, Sohrab Pour H. Morphologic assessment of peripheral blood cells in chemical injured veterans. Kowsar Med J 2000;5:295-301.
Maleki M, Tayebi Meibodi N, Javidi Z, Nahidi Y. Merckel cell carcinoma on mustard scar. A case report. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci 2008;50:444-50.
Glass TA, Goodman SN, Hernán MA, Samet JM. Causal inference in public health. Annu Rev Public Health 2013;34:61-75.
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Advice on assistance and protection provided by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: Part 3. On medical care and treatment of injuries from sulfur mustard
| ||Christopher M. Timperley,Jonathan E. Forman,Mohammad Abdollahi,Abdullah Saeed Al-Amri,Augustin Baulig,Djafer Benachour,Veronica Borrett,Flerida A. Cariño,Christophe Curty,Michael Geist,David Gonzalez,William Kane,Zrinka Kovarik,Roberto Martínez-Álvarez,Nicia Maria Fusaro Mourão,Slawomir Neffe,Syed K. Raza,Valentin Rubaylo,Alejandra Graciela Suárez,Koji Takeuchi,Cheng Tang,Ferruccio Trifirò,Francois Mauritz van Straten,Paula S. Vanninen,Slavica Vucinic,Volodymyr Zaitsev,Muhammad Zafar-Uz-Zaman,Mongia Saïd Zina,Stian Holen,Wesam S. Alwan,Vivek Suri,Peter J. Hotchkiss,Mostafa Ghanei |
| ||Toxicology. 2021; : 152967 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Chemical warfare agent research in precision-cut tissue slices—a useful alternative approach
| ||Julia Herbert,Debra L. Laskin,Andrew J. Gow,Jeffrey D. Laskin |
| ||Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Deciphering the role of microRNAs in mustard gas–induced toxicity
| ||Neha Mishra,Komal Raina,Rajesh Agarwal |
| ||Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Endurance Training on Apoptotic Inducing Factor (AIF) in Cerebellum of Type 1 Diabetic Rats
| ||Asma Taheri,Abdolhamid Habibi,Saeed Shakeryan,Masoud Nikbakht,Mohammad Reza Tabandeh |
| ||Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2020; 8(3): 0 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Advice on assistance and protection provided by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: Part 1. On medical care and treatment of injuries from blister and nerve agents
| ||Christopher M. Timperley,Jonathan E. Forman,Mohammad Abdollahi,Abdullah Saeed Al-Amri,Augustin Baulig,Djafer Benachour,Veronica Borrett,Flerida A. Cariño,Michael Geist,David Gonzalez,William Kane,Zrinka Kovarik,Roberto Martínez-Álvarez,Nicia Maria Fusaro Mourão,Slawomir Neffe,Syed K. Raza,Valentin Rubaylo,Alejandra Graciela Suárez,Koji Takeuchi,Cheng Tang,Ferruccio Trifirò,Francois Mauritz van Straten,Paula S. Vanninen,Slavica Vucinic,Volodymyr Zaitsev,Muhammad Zafar-Uz-Zaman,Mongia Saïd Zina,Stian Holen |
| ||Toxicology. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||An evidence-based review of the genotoxic and reproductive effects of sulfur mustard
| ||Fazlullah Khan,Kamal Niaz,Fatima Ismail Hassan,Mohammad Abdollahi |
| ||Archives of Toxicology. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|