|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 17
Risk factors for addiction potential among college students
Mehdi Ranjbaran1, Faeze Mohammadshahi2, Sorour Mani3, Mahmood Karimy2
1 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Public Health, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
3 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
|Date of Submission||29-Dec-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||08-May-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||08-Feb-2018|
Department of Public Health, School of Health, Golestan Street, Daneshgah Avenue, Arak
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Tendency toward addiction is provided before drug use begins. The present study aimed to identify the risk factors for addiction potential in the students of Arak University of Medical Sciences. Methods: We conducted this cross-sectional study among 305 students from Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2016. We selected the students by stratified random sampling and collected the data by family and sociodemographic factors questionnaires and Addiction Potential Scale. Results: Male students, students with low economic status and high family members were more prone to addiction. We identified variable; addiction in close friends, adverse family conditions (dispute with the family), poor economic condition of families, and family size by controlling the effect of other variables, as risk factors for addiction potential. Conclusions: Preventive and intervention actions appear necessary considering the mentioned factors.
Keywords: Addiction potential, Iran, students
|How to cite this article:|
Ranjbaran M, Mohammadshahi F, Mani S, Karimy M. Risk factors for addiction potential among college students. Int J Prev Med 2018;9:17
| Introduction|| |
Drug addiction or substance dependence is “a chronic, relapsing disorder in which compulsive drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior persist despite serious negative consequences.” In addition to the physical and psychological complications, substance dependency can increase morbidity and mortality rate., Addiction potential is defined as; “beliefs and attitudes toward drug use and perception of related consequences as either negative or positive.” Adolescents and young people including college students are more vulnerable for mental health problems, especially drug addiction., According to the latest estimates, high prevalence of addiction in young population has been reported., Since the treatment of addiction is often useless and because the tendency toward consumption and context of addiction is provided before drug use begins,, therefore, we can identify the risk factors for this tendency and prevent one step earlier. The present study aimed to identify the risk factors for addiction potential in the students of Arak University of Medical Sciences.
| Methods|| |
We conducted this cross-sectional study among 305 students from Arak University of Medical Sciences, Markazi Province, Iran in 2016. Markazi Province is located in Western Iran, and its capital is Arak. We considered schools as strata and selected students by simple random sampling in each school. We collected the data by two questionnaires; (1) family and sociodemographic factors questionnaires and (2) Addiction Potential Scale (APS). The APS is a 39 items questionnaires with “Yes” or “No” responses to each question developed by Weed et al. to evaluate addiction potential to alcohol and other drug problems. In this study, we used Persian version of this questionnaires which containing 36 questions, and each question is scored from zero (totally true) to three (completely false); therefore, the range of total score is zero to 108. The validity of the APS has been approved by two methods; criterion and construct validity and its reliability was estimated 0.90 by Cronbach's alpha. We carried out data analysis by the SPSS-20 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) software using Spearman and Pearson correlation, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression. For ethical considerations, we obtained oral informed consent from participants and also the research proposal was approved by Deputy of Research and Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences white ethics number IR. ARAKMU. REC.1394.378.
| Results|| |
We studied 305 students with mean age of 21.91 ± 2.37 years including 196 (64.5%) females and 108 (35.5%) males. The average number of family members was 4.89 ± 1.33 persons. [Table 1] displays participants' demographic and socioeconomic variables. We estimated the average addiction potential score 22.54 ± 16.17 ranged between zero to 90. As shown in [Table 1], based on the results of t-test and one-way ANOVA, mean score of addiction potential in male students significantly was higher than female (P < 0.001). Furthermore, we found that students with low economic status are more prone to addiction (P < 0.001). Also, at the present study, we identify the role of four environmental factors including addiction in close friends, addiction in family members, dispute with the family and divorce or solving problems in family courts in students' tendency toward addiction [Table 1]. The results of Spearman and Pearson correlation revealed positive correlation between number of household members and addiction potential score (r = 0.183, P = 0.002). We did not find significant correlation between age (r = 0.071, P = 0.216) and semester (r = −0.019, P = 0.742) with addiction potential score.
|Table 1: Relationship between demographic, socioeconomic characteristics, and some environmental factors with students' addiction potential|
Click here to view
Finally, the variables that had a P ≤ 0.2 in univariate analysis were entered into the multiple linear regression model [Table 2]. Results revealed variables; addiction in close friends, dispute with the family, poor economic status of family and number of household members by controlling the effect of other variables as significant predictors of addiction potential in students (R2 = 0.28, adjusted R2 = 0.26).
|Table 2: Multiple regression model for predictors of addiction potential in students|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In this study, we identified variables; addiction in close friends, dispute with the family, poor economic status of family and number of household members as risk factors of addiction tendency in students. In our study, drug addiction in close friends was related to more addiction tendency in students. In the study at Urmia University of Medical Sciences, youth participants emphasized the role of peers in substance abuse. This finding has also been confirmed in several other studies.,, It seems that in addition to inducing role of addicted friends, availability of substance by friends increases the opportunity to facing with substance, tendency, and consumption as well as. In this study, we found that student's dispute with family increases their tendency toward addiction. Shahriari et al. found a significant negative association between family members' emotional relation and tendency to addiction. Zeinali, and Foroutani and Rezaeian  identified neglect and lack of parental control as one of the important factors in people tendency to drug abuse. Galea et al. in a review study introduced family adverse conditions as a risk factor for the onset of substance abuse. Warm relations between family members especially with children; increase the possibility of attracting them to the family and reduces the likelihood of escape and refuge to groups of friends or abnormal groups. In the present study, we identified poor economic status and number of household members as other predictive factors of a tendency to addiction. Based on the existing literature, socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with different health outcomes. In several studies, substance abuse was reported more in people with weak socioeconomic classes.,, Probably, the low economic status or big family size, take entertainment and other appropriate opportunities from people and put him at risk for drug use. In contrast, some studies found the relationship between SES and substance abuse varies according to the type of drug. In a study by Humensky, high SES was associated with a high intake of cocaine, marijuana, and alcohol while such association was not seen with crystal methamphetamine and other substances. In Patrick et al. study, high SES was associated with more consumption of alcohol and marijuana and low SES with higher consumption of cigarettes. The most important limitation of this study was that it only applicable to the college students and we can conduct this study with a wider scope in general population.
| Conclusions|| |
Preventive and intervention actions appear necessary considering the mentioned risk factors of a tendency to addiction in students.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Arak University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 2537) for financial support and all students that participate in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Arak University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number: 2537).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Camí J, Farré M. Drug addiction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:975-86.
Paquot N, De Flines J, Scheen AJ. Alcoholism, an addiction leading to multiple somatic complications. Rev Med Liege 2013;68:272-80.
Kurta DG. Suicide risk in college students: The effects of internet addiction and drug use. Educ Sci Theory Pract 2015;4:841-8.
Nikmanesh Z, Adrom M, Bakhshani NM. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory score as a predictor of addiction potential in youth. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2012;1:22-6.
Muzammil K, Singh S, Singh JV, Davey S, Raghav S, Khalil S. A cross-sectional study of tobacco addiction among college students of Muzaffarnagar city. Indian J Community Health 2015;27:125-8.
Cheverikina EA, Rakhimgarayeva RM, Sadovaya VV, Zakirova VG, Starodubets OD, Klemes VS. Socio-psycological characteristics of college students who are prone to addictions. Am J Appl Sci 2014;11:1412-7.
Didarloo A, Pourali R. University students' views regarding reasons for drug abuse among youths. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2016;5:e24778.
Raghibi M. Examining high risk behaviors among students of Zahedan Universities. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2012;1:39-43.
Zeinali A, Vahdat R. Addiction susceptibility and adolescents: Evidence for psychosocial development of addiction. Life Sci J 2013;10:118-21.
Zeinali A. Epidemiology of addiction susceptibility in the students of West Azerbaijan Islamic Azad Universities. Life Sci J 2013;10:172-7.
Weed NC, Butcher JN, McKenna T, Ben-Porath YS. New measures for assessing alcohol and drug abuse with the MMPI-2: The APS and AAS. J Pers Assess 1992;58:389-404.
Zargar Y, Najarian B, Naami A. The relationship of some personality variables, religious attitudes and marital satisfaction with addiction potential in personnel of an industrial factory in Ahvaz. J Educ Psychol 2008;15:99-120.
Tompsett CJ, Domoff SE, Toro PA. Peer substance use and homelessness predicting substance abuse from adolescence through early adulthood. Am J Community Psychol 2013;51:520-9.
Haller M, Handley E, Chassin L, Bountress K. Developmental cascades: Linking adolescent substance use, affiliation with substance use promoting peers, and academic achievement to adult substance use disorders. Dev Psychopathol 2010;22:899-916.
Tarter RE, Fishbein D, Kirisci L, Mezzich A, Ridenour T, Vanyukov M. Deviant socialization mediates transmissible and contextual risk on cannabis use disorder development: A prospective study. Addiction 2011;106:1301-8.
Shahriari S, Dastjerdi R, Hojat Zadeh N, Kikhani R, Ramezani A. Family function on tendency students towards addiction and substance abuse. J Zabol Univ Med Sci Health Serv 2013;5:1-9.
Foroutani M, Rezaeian M. Knowledge and drug abuse among university students in the town pf Larestan. Iran J Nurs 2005;18:21-9.
Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:36-52.
Keshtkar A, Ranjbaran M, Soori H, Etemad K, Khashayar P, Dini M, et al
. Is the relationship between individual-and family-levels socioeconomic status with disease different? Analyzing third stage data of IMOS. Koomesh. 2015;17:27-36.
Goodman E, Huang B. Socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, and adolescent substance use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:448-53.
Hanson MD, Chen E. Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: A review of the literature. J Behav Med 2007;30:263-85.
Schoenborn CA, Adams PE. Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005-2007. Vital Health Stat 10 2010;245:1-132.
Humensky JL. Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood? Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2010;5:19.
Patrick ME, Wightman P, Schoeni RF, Schulenberg JE. Socioeconomic status and substance use among young adults: A comparison across constructs and drugs. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012;73:772-82.
[Table 1], [Table 2]