|
 
 |
| BRIEF COMMUNICATION |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 1 | Page : 166 |
|
Breast cancer on instagram: A descriptive study
Corey H Basch1, Sarah A MacLean2
1 Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall, Wayne, NJ, USA
2 Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, USA
| Date of Submission | 28-Jan-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 27-Jun-2019 |
| Date of Web Publication | 09-Oct-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Corey H Basch
Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall 366, Wayne, NJ – 07470
USA
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_36_19
Background: Breast cancer has an impact not only on those who are diagnosed, but also on their social network, creating an even greater need for the availability of reliable information and support. Methods: The purpose of this study was to document the content of posts on the highly popular social media platform, Instagram. Posts were garnered and analyzed from Instagram using the hashtag #breastcancer. Data were collected at three different points in time in 2018 and were then aggregated. Results: The most common attributes were highlighting an individual story (n = 76), discussing support for those with breast cancer (n = 75), discussing treatment (n = 55), or promoting an alternative treatment or product (n = 24). Posts that contained images of people were more likely highlight an individual story (P = 0.001) and discuss treatment (P = 0.046). Conclusions: Future research can focus on best practices for developing breast cancer-related information on social media.
Keywords: Breast cancer, Instagram, social media
How to cite this article:
Basch CH, MacLean SA. Breast cancer on instagram: A descriptive study. Int J Prev Med 2019;10:166 |
| Introduction | |  |
Breast cancer is a highly common cancer in women in the United States (US).[1] In the US, on an annual basis, roughly 237,000 cases of breast cancer are diagnosed in women and 2100 in men. This results in an estimated 41,000 deaths in women and 450 deaths in men annually.[1] Breast cancer has an impact not only on those who are diagnosed, but also on their social network as well, creating an even greater need for the availability of reliable information and support. Although this can happen in different ways, it is typical that the internet and specifically varied forms of social media become sources of both information and support. The purpose of this study was to document the content of posts on the highly popular social media platform, Instagram.
| Methods | | |
Using a fact sheet from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, content categories on breast cancer were established.[1] Methods for this descriptive study were adapted from prior studies.[2],[3] Posts were garnered from Instagram using the hashtag #breast cancer. Data were collected at three different points in time, 3 weeks apart in 2018 (December 7, December 14, and December 21), and was then aggregated. One researcher conducted the coding. Each time data were coded, the 50 most recent posts were included in the sample. Posts that were irrelevant or those which included text not in the English language were excluded. At the first, second, and third collection points there were 1,869,298, 1,872,894, and 1,877,045 posts, respectively. A total of 14 posts were excluded in the first round of coding, 23 in the second, and 19 in the third. During each coding period, Instagram posts were coded for purpose and/or content. Content categories were coded in a dichotomous fashion using yes or no to indicate the presence of absence of each. A subset of ten videos were coded by a second coder with good interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa = 0.936).
Independent sample t-tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square tests of association for categorical variables. Results were considered to be significant if P < 0.05. SPSS (v23) software was used to conduct the statistical analysis. The IRB at William Paterson University does not review studies that do not involve human subjects and considers them to be exempt.
| Results | | |
Among the 150 posts analyzed, the mean number of likes was 27.17 (standard deviation 42.66) with a range of 0–316 likes. Most posts contained an image with text (n = 146), whereas some contained a video with text (n = 4). Among the 85 videos (57%) that contained an image of a person, most were of women (n = 67) versus both men and women (n = 13) or only men (n = 5).
The most common attributes were highlighting an individual story (n = 76), discussing support for those with breast cancer (n = 75), discussing treatment (n = 55), or promoting an alternative treatment or product [n = 24, [Table 1]. Posts that contained images of people were more likely highlight an individual story (P = 0.001) and discuss treatment [P = 0.046, [Table 2]. Posts without people were more likely to promote an alternative treatment or product (P < 0.001). Posts did not differ significantly in mean number of likes based on any of the content categories.
| Discussion | | |
The findings of this study only begin to scratch the surface of describing breast cancer content on Instagram. A prior study exploring the activity of reproductive cancers on Instagram and Twitter indicated that women's reproductive cancers outperformed men's both during campaign periods as well as other times.[4] This confirms the findings of this study in part by way of confirming that breast cancer posts on Instagram tended to focus more on support and versus actionable items.[4]
Prior research suggests that information on the internet related to breast cancer can be difficult to read.[5] The extent to which this influences consumers to turn to other platforms that use primarily images or videos is not well-known and hence is another area for further exploration. This is especially important since breast cancer-related videos have demonstrated inconsistent reliability and coverage of important topics.[6],[7]
This study has several limitations. The limited data collection of a descriptive study at three close points in time and the small sample size make the results no generalizable. The incredibly large number of posts suggests that future studies could include a much more robust sample over time. The changing nature of content on the internet also limits this study, which was accounted for here by coding posts at three points in time; however, these points in time were close, which may have influenced results. Nevertheless, this study can provide a springboard for further research on this platform. Future research can focus on best practices for developing breast cancer-related information on social media.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | |
| 2. | Basch CH, Milano M, Hillyer GC. An assessment of fluoride related posts on Instagram. Health Promot Perspect 2019;9:85-8.  |
| 3. | Basch CH, MacLean S. A content analysis of HPV related posts on Instagram. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018;1-3. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1560774. |
| 4. | Vraga EK, Stefanidis A, Lamprianidis G, Croitoru A, Crooks AT, Delamater PL, et al. Cancer and social media: A comparison of traffic about breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other reproductive cancers on Twitter and Instagram. J Health Commun 2018;23:181-9. |
| 5. | Basch CH, MacLean S, Garcia P, Basch CE. Readability of on-line breast cancer information. Breast J 2019;25:562-3. |
| 6. | Basch CH, Hillyer GC, MacDonald ZL, Reeves R, Basch CE. Characteristics of YouTube videos related to mammography. J Cancer Educ 2015;30:699-703. |
| 7. | Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Guerro S, Sackstein P, Basch CE. YouTube videos as a source of information about mastectomy. Breast J 2019;25:349-50. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Can Social Media Profiles Be a Reliable Source of Information on Nutrition and Dietetics? |
|
| Pawel Kabata, Dorota Winniczuk-Kabata, Piotr Maciej Kabata, Janusz Jaskiewicz, Karol Polom | | Healthcare. 2022; 10(2): 397 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Deep Learning for Identification of Alcohol on Social Media: Exploratory Analysis of Alcohol-Related Outcomes from Reddit and Twitter (Preprint) |
|
| Benjamin Joseph Ricard,Saeed Hassanpour | | Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
The Afterlife of Breast Cancer: Exploring the Digital Performativity of Post-Treatment Patienthood |
|
| Neha Gupta | | Journal of Creative Communications. 2021; : 0973258621 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Online Self-Disclosure and Social Sharing of Emotions of Women with Breast Cancer Using Instagram–Qualitative Conventional Content Analysis |
|
| Magdalena Pluta | | Chronic Illness. 2021; : 1742395321 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Characterising experiences with acute myeloid leukaemia using an Instagram content analysis |
|
| Catriona Parker,Ella Zomer,Danny Liew,Darshini Ayton,M Barton Laws | | PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(5): e0250641 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Instagram As a Window to Societal Perspective on Mental Health, Gender, and Race: An Observational Pilot Study (Preprint) |
|
| Kierstin Utter,Eva Waineo,Capricia M Bell,Harrison L Quaal,Diane L. Levine | | JMIR Mental Health. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Head and Neck Cancer and Social Media: The Patient Experience and Cancer Survivorship |
|
| Rebecca W. Gao,Joshua D. Smith,Kelly M. Malloy | | The Laryngoscope. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Whatæs in a hashtag: A content evaluation of Instagram posts related to orthodontic retention and retainers |
|
| Maurice J. Meade,Craig W. Dreyer | | Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
The Usefulness of Instagram Posts Tagging Hand Surgery Conditions |
|
| Dafang Zhang,Brandon E. Earp | | Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
#celiacdisease: The Use of Instagram in Contending with Chronic Illness |
|
| Zoe Meleo-Erwin,Corey H. Basch,Joseph Fera,Bonnie Smith | | Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. 2020; 24(1): 35 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for